• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 52 54 62 47 PROFICIENT 38 41 32 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 3 4 6 FAILING 2 3 3 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 61 69 60 64 PROFICIENT 22 26 22 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 3 15 9 FAILING 3 3 3 5

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 13 37 20 PROFICIENT 52 59 43 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 25 15 39 FAILING 0 3 5 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 7 11 9 PROFICIENT 71 75 62 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 13 20 14 WARNING 2 4 8 6

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 15 20 16 PROFICIENT 29 27 24 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 42 33 35 WARNING 18 16 24 22

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 0 0 0 PROFICIENT 51 32 35 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 54 48 59 WARNING 11 14 17 14

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 8 5 10 PROFICIENT 59 53 53 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 28 34 20 WARNING 4 10 8 0

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 19 15 19 PROFICIENT 31 36 44 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 36 20 29 WARNING 24 10 20 8

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 8 24 18 PROFICIENT 60 56 55 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 26 20 28 WARNING 6 10 1 8

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 29 47 38 PROFICIENT 23 40 37 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 14 14 19 WARNING 10 17 1 3

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 13 25 28 PROFICIENT 49 56 44 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 29 23 19 WARNING 8 3 8 3

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 34 28 39 PROFICIENT 35 36 36 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 23 24 18 WARNING 14 7 12 7

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 42 26 26 PROFICIENT 36 32 35 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 23 30 25 WARNING 8 3 9 6

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 23 17 23 PROFICIENT 59 47 54 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 19 21 29 WARNING 1 12 7 8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 18 14 30 PROFICIENT 35 39 51 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 32 29 29 WARNING 1 11 6 4

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 15 11 19 PROFICIENT 45 42 41 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 33 41 20 WARNING 11 10 6 8

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 17 33 39 PROFICIENT 52 38 30 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 25 26 16 WARNING 11 21 11 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.