• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 68 64 75 65 PROFICIENT 29 33 23 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 3 1 1 2 FAILING 0 1 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 82 82 81 77 PROFICIENT 15 12 15 15 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 4 2 5 FAILING 1 2 1 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 56 55 56 55 PROFICIENT 38 37 36 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 6 7 10 FAILING 0 2 1 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 28 37 29 PROFICIENT 60 65 52 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 6 6 4 WARNING 2 2 5 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 46 41 35 40 PROFICIENT 28 34 38 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 17 18 17 WARNING 5 8 9 3

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 9 9 10 PROFICIENT 53 49 48 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 32 33 35 WARNING 5 9 10 4

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 28 22 23 PROFICIENT 64 56 70 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 12 7 9 WARNING 2 4 2 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 32 38 38 PROFICIENT 33 31 40 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 28 16 16 WARNING 12 8 6 10

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 38 33 30 PROFICIENT 55 50 53 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 9 11 12 WARNING 2 3 3 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 47 49 54 PROFICIENT 34 38 33 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 10 12 12 WARNING 7 5 6 7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 36 36 40 PROFICIENT 56 46 48 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 13 10 9 WARNING 2 5 6 2

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 50 52 56 65 PROFICIENT 34 26 28 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 14 11 6 WARNING 3 7 6 4

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 51 48 41 PROFICIENT 43 31 31 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 13 18 16 WARNING 3 4 3 3

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 27 26 29 PROFICIENT 59 53 54 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 16 16 15 WARNING 2 4 4 3

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 38 45 42 PROFICIENT 41 38 35 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 19 16 22 WARNING 5 5 4 3

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 31 29 29 PROFICIENT 58 52 53 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 14 15 14 WARNING 3 4 3 2

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 62 56 59 PROFICIENT 57 25 29 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 9 11 10 WARNING 4 4 4 1

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.