• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 48 64 42 PROFICIENT 63 51 33 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 1 2 4 FAILING 1 1 1 4

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 66 56 68 52 PROFICIENT 27 33 29 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 10 0 10 FAILING 2 2 4 8

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 31 42 40 PROFICIENT 66 51 55 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 17 0 9 FAILING 2 1 3 5

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 16 20 16 PROFICIENT 64 69 63 74 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 11 13 6 WARNING 2 4 4 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 19 28 12 PROFICIENT 35 41 25 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 33 31 26 WARNING 12 7 16 9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 6 1 0 PROFICIENT 44 52 33 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 32 54 56 WARNING 7 11 12 6

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 8 9 25 PROFICIENT 61 65 69 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 24 19 15 WARNING 3 2 3 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 27 17 30 PROFICIENT 47 34 47 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 32 25 19 WARNING 13 7 11 12

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 16 16 10 PROFICIENT 65 63 58 62 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 17 17 23 WARNING 5 5 9 5

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 27 42 37 PROFICIENT 33 41 38 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 26 14 16 WARNING 10 7 6 10

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 21 18 19 PROFICIENT 66 49 52 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 21 26 21 WARNING 6 10 4 6

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 43 34 39 PROFICIENT 46 33 39 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 18 20 16 WARNING 7 6 7 12

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 34 29 27 PROFICIENT 48 36 41 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 26 24 29 WARNING 6 5 6 5

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 6 3 8 PROFICIENT 45 51 44 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 37 41 37 WARNING 8 6 12 10

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 10 14 11 PROFICIENT 35 49 39 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 31 38 39 WARNING 5 10 8 7

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 25 16 13 PROFICIENT 64 49 48 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 21 32 29 WARNING 4 5 4 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 26 36 37 PROFICIENT 66 46 44 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 21 13 15 WARNING 6 8 7 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.