• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 40 48 33 PROFICIENT 64 58 52 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 2 0 4 FAILING 1 0 0 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 46 56 66 46 PROFICIENT 31 30 22 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 14 9 14 FAILING 5 0 2 4

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 17 14 24 PROFICIENT 62 57 56 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 26 30 27 FAILING 1 0 0 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 7 18 13 PROFICIENT 71 76 66 76 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 14 12 11 WARNING 0 3 4 0

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 7 17 11 PROFICIENT 29 26 33 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 43 33 41 WARNING 17 23 16 16

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 1 3 2 PROFICIENT 28 23 39 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 57 52 47 40 WARNING 14 25 12 10

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 14 7 2 PROFICIENT 56 65 68 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 20 24 20 WARNING 6 1 2 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 16 12 5 PROFICIENT 20 25 33 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 41 40 35 WARNING 33 18 16 28

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 13 4 6 PROFICIENT 42 44 59 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 36 34 44 WARNING 9 6 3 7

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 15 10 13 PROFICIENT 33 34 40 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 35 40 34 WARNING 18 16 10 24

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 6 10 6 PROFICIENT 55 46 40 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 36 42 39 WARNING 10 13 9 10

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 4 15 13 PROFICIENT 35 35 36 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 38 32 34 WARNING 22 23 17 21

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 7 11 6 PROFICIENT 29 19 28 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 51 51 44 WARNING 18 23 10 16

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 6 4 5 PROFICIENT 37 35 40 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 42 47 47 WARNING 16 17 9 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 6 9 10 PROFICIENT 30 18 30 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 51 57 50 45 WARNING 12 18 11 11

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 5 12 9 PROFICIENT 52 45 49 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 45 32 38 WARNING 5 5 7 4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 13 50 30 PROFICIENT 46 42 30 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 31 17 15 WARNING 12 15 3 3

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.