Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Florence Sawyer School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2016 Accountability Data - Florence Sawyer School

Organization Information
District:Nashoba (07250000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Florence Sawyer School (07250025)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.9, Target = 97.7CPI = 94.9, Target = 97.7CPI = 94.9, Target = 97.7 96.1 94.7 94.9 0.2 97.7 98.1 91493100Above Target
High needsCPI = 81.4, Target = 89.4CPI = 81.4, Target = 89.4CPI = 81.4, Target = 89.4 81.9 81.2 81.4 0.2 89.4 91.0 739850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 94, Target = 89.8CPI = 94, Target = 89.8CPI = 94, Target = 89.8 88.9 88.9 94.0 5.1 89.8 94.5 9729100Above Target
ELL and Former ELL -------8--
Students w/disabilitiesCPI = 76.1, Target = 87.9CPI = 76.1, Target = 87.9CPI = 76.1, Target = 87.9 79.2 76.5 76.1 -0.4 87.9 89.6 856925No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  97.6---- 98.8-26--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95, Target = 97.8CPI = 95, Target = 97.8CPI = 95, Target = 97.8 96.3 94.9 95.0 0.1 97.8 98.2 84448100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 95.7CPI = 91, Target = 95.7CPI = 91, Target = 95.7 92.6 91.4 91.0 -0.4 95.7 96.3 8949775On Target
High needsCPI = 67.8, Target = 84CPI = 67.8, Target = 84CPI = 67.8, Target = 84 72.6 72.8 67.8 -5.0 84.0 86.3 491010Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81, Target = 81.2CPI = 81, Target = 81.2 79.5 79.5 81.0 1.5 81.2 89.8 882975On Target
ELL and Former ELL -------8--
Students w/disabilitiesCPI = 58.3, Target = 81.1CPI = 58.3, Target = 81.1CPI = 58.3, Target = 81.1 67.6 66.2 58.3 -7.9 81.1 83.8 64720Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  98.8---- 99.4-26--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 95.9CPI = 91, Target = 95.9CPI = 91, Target = 95.9 93.0 91.7 91.0 -0.7 95.9 96.5 7545175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.4, Target = 92.2CPI = 85.4, Target = 92.2CPI = 85.4, Target = 92.2 86.7 90.2 85.4 -4.8 92.2 93.4 8515875On Target
High needsCPI = 65.4, Target = 78.4CPI = 65.4, Target = 78.4CPI = 65.4, Target = 78.4 62.9 69.2 65.4 -3.8 78.4 81.5 75260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
ELL and Former ELL -------2--
Students w/disabilities  59.3---- 79.7-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.5, Target = 92.2CPI = 85.5, Target = 92.2CPI = 85.5, Target = 92.2 86.6 91.3 85.5 -5.8 92.2 93.3 6914875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.4 21.34930 1.2 1.44930
High needs 4.5 6.19825 5.6 6.1980
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.4 10.32925 0.0 0.02925
ELL and Former ELL--8---8-
Students w/disabilities 2.9 1.4690 7.4 8.7690
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--26---26-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.1 22.14480 1.3 1.144825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 46.1 45.34970 3.7 5.64970
High needs 16.7 12.91010 18.9 25.71010
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.9 20.72925 14.3 13.8290
ELL and Former ELL--8---8-
Students w/disabilities 13.2 6.9720 23.5 34.7720
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--26---26-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 44.7 44.34510 3.2 5.84510
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 9.5 17.115825 1.5 3.21580
High needs 0.0 7.72625 10.0 15.4260
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
ELL and Former ELL--2---2-
Students w/disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.9 17.614825 0.6 3.41480
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 52.0 55.5 3.5 51.0No40075On Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 45.0 48.0 3.0 51.0No7650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
ELL and Former ELL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/disabilitiesSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 45.0 47.5 2.5 51.0No5650Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-19--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 51.5 55.0 3.5 51.0No36675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 54.0 53.0 -1.0 51.0No40375On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 42.0 43.0 1.0 51.0No8050Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
ELL and Former ELL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/disabilitiesSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 40.0 42.0 2.0 51.0No5950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-19--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 52.0 52.0 0.0 51.0No36775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06-
High needs- 60.06-
ELL and Former ELL- 60.06-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students50850098Yes51050699Yes16316199Yes
High needs10610195Yes10610498Yes282796Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2929100Yes2929100Yes8---
ELL and Former ELL8---8---2---
Students w/disabilities777296Yes777597Yes222195Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2626100Yes2626100Yes4---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino16---16---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White45945298Yes45945599Yes15114999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.