Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Abbot Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Abbot Elementary
Organization Information
District:Westford (03260000)School type:Elementary School
School:Abbot Elementary (03260004)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.6, Target = 95.6CPI = 95.6, Target = 95.6 92.5 95.9 95.6 -0.3 95.6 96.3 97385100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.3, Target = 85.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 85.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 85.7 75.4 87.7 87.3 -0.4 85.7 87.7 9373100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 84.8, Target = 82.8CPI = 84.8, Target = 82.8CPI = 84.8, Target = 82.8 70.5 86.1 84.8 -1.3 82.8 85.3 9556100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.6, Target = 99.1CPI = 96.6, Target = 99.1CPI = 96.6, Target = 99.1 98.5 96.0 96.6 0.6 99.1 99.3 7858100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.5, Target = 95.2CPI = 95.5, Target = 95.2 91.7 96.0 95.5 -0.5 95.2 95.9 94315100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.2, Target = 95.7CPI = 96.2, Target = 95.7 92.6 94.2 96.2 2.0 95.7 96.3 97385100Above Target
High needsCPI = 88, Target = 88CPI = 88, Target = 88 79.5 84.8 88.0 3.2 88.0 89.8 937375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 87.1, Target = 86.8CPI = 87.1, Target = 86.8 77.3 82.1 87.1 5.0 86.8 88.7 975675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.6, Target = 100CPI = 96.6, Target = 100CPI = 96.6, Target = 100 100.0 98.0 96.6 -1.4 100.0 100.0 5558100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96, Target = 95.3CPI = 96, Target = 95.3 91.9 93.5 96.0 2.5 95.3 96.0 95315100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 95.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 95.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 95.8 92.8 92.1 92.7 0.6 95.8 96.4 92157100Above Target
High needsCPI = 80.2, Target = 88.5CPI = 80.2, Target = 88.5CPI = 80.2, Target = 88.5 82.7- 80.2 13.3 88.5 91.4 882950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities  79.8---- 89.9-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  96.4---- 98.2-30--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.6, Target = 95.5CPI = 92.6, Target = 95.5CPI = 92.6, Target = 95.5 92.3 91.9 92.6 0.7 95.5 96.2 87122100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.0 30.63850 0.8 2.13850
High needs 12.3 13.77325 4.6 9.6730
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 5.6 10.75625 5.6 12.5560
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 54.0 55.2580 0.0 3.4580
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.1 26.03150 1.0 1.93150
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 49.5 58.438525 1.8 1.038525
High needs 25.0 35.67325 6.3 5.57325
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 20.8 32.15625 7.5 7.1560
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 74.6 82.85825 0.0 1.7580
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 44.6 54.631525 2.0 1.031525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.3 35.01570 1.7 1.91570
High needs 9.7 24.12925 16.1 6.92925
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--30---30-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.2 31.11220 2.2 2.51220
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 69.0 56.5 -12.5 51.0No27075On Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 62.5 60.0 -2.5 51.0Yes49100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 59.0 60.0 1.0 51.0Yes37100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 69.0 67.0 -2.0 51.0Yes44100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 68.5 55.0 -13.5 51.0No21775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 65.0 52.0 -13.0 51.0Yes27075On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 49.5 43.0 -6.5 51.0Yes4975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 46.0 45.0 -1.0 51.0Yes3775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 83.5 63.5 -20.0 51.0No44100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 63.0 50.0 -13.0 51.0Yes21775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students39739499Yes39739499Yes159159100Yes
High needs767497Yes767497Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20---6---
EL and Former EL7---7---3---
Students w/ disabilities585697Yes585697Yes2121100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian6060100Yes6060100Yes3030100Yes
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White32432199Yes32432199Yes124124100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles