Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Israel Loring School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Israel Loring School

Organization Information
District:Sudbury (02880000)School type:Elementary School
School:Israel Loring School (02880015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.3 93.6 93.6 94.2 0.6 96.3 96.8 90239100Above Target
High needsCPI = 78.8, Target = 85.7CPI = 78.8, Target = 85.7CPI = 78.8, Target = 85.7 75.5 77.9 78.8 0.9 85.7 87.8 655250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 83.2CPI = 75, Target = 83.2CPI = 75, Target = 83.2 71.2 73.8 75.0 1.2 83.2 85.6 774350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian  95.2---- 97.6-27--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 94.3, Target = 96.5CPI = 94.3, Target = 96.5CPI = 94.3, Target = 96.5 94.0 94.0 94.3 0.3 96.5 97.0 87181100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.4, Target = 96.2CPI = 93.4, Target = 96.2CPI = 93.4, Target = 96.2 93.5 96.1 93.4 -2.7 96.2 96.8 8623875On Target
High needsCPI = 77.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 77.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 77.4, Target = 85.4 75.0 84.6 77.4 -7.2 85.4 87.5 57520Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.2, Target = 83.2CPI = 76.2, Target = 83.2CPI = 76.2, Target = 83.2 71.2 82.7 76.2 -6.5 83.2 85.6 80430Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian  100.0---- 100.0-27--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 96.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 96.4 93.9 97.3 95.4 -1.9 96.4 97.0 92180100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.5, Target = 97CPI = 95.5, Target = 97CPI = 95.5, Target = 97 94.9 91.6 95.5 3.9 97.0 97.5 9773100Above Target
High needs -------13--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------3--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.5, Target = 97.1CPI = 96.5, Target = 97.1 95.0 94.4 96.5 2.1 97.1 97.5 9757100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 28.6 37.723925 2.8 2.92390
High needs 3.8 3.8520 13.5 13.5520
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 2.4 2.3430 16.7 16.3430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--27---27-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 27.2 37.018125 3.1 3.31810
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 53.8 55.92380 1.6 3.82380
High needs 15.4 17.35225 7.7 17.3520
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 14.3 16.34325 9.5 20.9430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--27---27-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 52.1 55.61800 0.5 1.71800
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 29.1 42.57325 0.0 1.4730
High needs--13---13-
Econ. Disadvantaged--3---3-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.0 40.45725 0.0 1.8570
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 76.0 72.0 -4.0 51.0Yes156100Above Target
High needsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 66.5 55.5 -11.0 51.0No3475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 72.0 54.0 -18.0 51.0No2975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-19--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 77.0 72.0 -5.0 51.0Yes120100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 77.0 51.0 -26.0 51.0No15575On Target
High needsSGP = 25.5, Target = 51SGP = 25.5, Target = 51SGP = 25.5, Target = 51 52.0 25.5 -26.5 51.0No340Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51 42.0 25.0 -17.0 51.0No290Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-19--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 75.0 45.0 -30.0 51.0No11950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students242242100Yes242241100Yes7575100Yes
High needs5252100Yes5252100Yes13---
Econ. Disadvantaged14---14---3---
EL and Former EL3---3-------
Students w/ disabilities4343100Yes4343100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian2828100Yes2828100Yes8---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino12---12---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2-------
White183183100Yes18318299Yes5858100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles