Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cushing Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Cushing Elementary
Organization Information
District:Scituate (02640000)School type:Elementary School
School:Cushing Elementary (02640007)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 97.3CPI = 94.3, Target = 97.3CPI = 94.3, Target = 97.3 95.3 89.6 94.3 4.7 97.3 97.7 91229100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.2, Target = 90.4CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.4CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.4 83.5 74.6 84.2 9.6 90.4 91.8 854950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.1, Target = 89.6CPI = 80.1, Target = 89.6CPI = 80.1, Target = 89.6 82.2 66.9 80.1 13.2 89.6 91.1 893450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.5, Target = 97.8CPI = 94.5, Target = 97.8CPI = 94.5, Target = 97.8 96.2 89.5 94.5 5.0 97.8 98.1 88217100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.2, Target = 96.4CPI = 91.2, Target = 96.4CPI = 91.2, Target = 96.4 93.8 85.9 91.2 5.3 96.4 96.9 7722950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73, Target = 86.8CPI = 73, Target = 86.8CPI = 73, Target = 86.8 77.3 64.9 73.0 8.1 86.8 88.7 374950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.5, Target = 84.7CPI = 62.5, Target = 84.7CPI = 62.5, Target = 84.7 73.7 55.4 62.5 7.1 84.7 86.9 433450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 97CPI = 91, Target = 97CPI = 91, Target = 97 94.8 86.4 91.0 4.6 97.0 97.4 6921750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.6, Target = 96.9CPI = 85.6, Target = 96.9CPI = 85.6, Target = 96.9 94.7 91.4 85.6 -5.8 96.9 97.4 66470Declined
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.6, Target = 97.1CPI = 86.6, Target = 97.1CPI = 86.6, Target = 97.1 95.0 91.3 86.6 -4.7 97.1 97.5 57430Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.3 24.922925 4.2 1.722925
High needs 0.0 4.14925 15.5 8.24925
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.93425 21.6 11.83425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 25.321725 4.1 1.821725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.1 38.422925 6.0 3.522925
High needs 7.0 10.24925 19.3 14.34925
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 2.7 2.9340 27.0 20.63425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.5 38.721725 5.9 3.721725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.3 23.4470 1.4 4.3470
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.9 25.6430 1.6 4.7430
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 34.0 65.0 31.0 51.0Yes173100Above Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 25.0 52.0 27.0 51.0Yes40100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 24.0 52.0 28.0 51.0Yes29100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 33.0 66.5 33.5 51.0Yes162100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 34.0 55.0 21.0 51.0Yes172100Above Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 24.0 45.0 21.0 51.0Yes39100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 23.0 44.0 21.0 51.0Yes29100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 33.5 55.0 21.5 51.0Yes161100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students23923197Yes23923197Yes494898Yes
High needs554989No554989No13---
Econ. Disadvantaged21---21---6---
EL and Former EL3---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities373492No373492No9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5-------
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---2---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White22521997Yes22521997Yes454498Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles