Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Douglas Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Douglas Elementary School

Organization Information
District:Douglas (00770000)School type:Elementary School
School:Douglas Elementary School (00770015)Grades served:02,03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.7, Target = 88.7CPI = 88.7, Target = 88.7 84.9 86.7 88.7 2.0 88.7 92.5 6534475On Target
High needsCPI = 75.2, Target = 79.2CPI = 75.2, Target = 79.2CPI = 75.2, Target = 79.2 72.3 72.6 75.2 2.6 79.2 86.2 4611250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.2, Target = 79.3CPI = 79.2, Target = 79.3 77.4 77.4 79.2 1.8 79.3 88.7 617175On Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.7, Target = 71.9CPI = 62.7, Target = 71.9CPI = 62.7, Target = 71.9 62.5 59.7 62.7 3.0 71.9 81.3 456150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89, Target = 88.9CPI = 89, Target = 88.9 85.2 86.5 89.0 2.5 88.9 92.6 5531075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 88.5 84.6 84.1 84.4 0.3 88.5 92.3 4634450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.8, Target = 79CPI = 70.8, Target = 79CPI = 70.8, Target = 79 72.0 69.3 70.8 1.5 79.0 86.0 2811250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.4, Target = 75.5CPI = 76.4, Target = 75.5 73.3 73.3 76.4 3.1 75.5 86.7 487175On Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.4, Target = 71.9CPI = 59.4, Target = 71.9CPI = 59.4, Target = 71.9 62.5 59.7 59.4 -0.3 71.9 81.3 356125No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.6, Target = 88.5CPI = 84.6, Target = 88.5CPI = 84.6, Target = 88.5 84.7 84.6 84.6 0.0 88.5 92.4 3131025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.1, Target = 91.3CPI = 80.1, Target = 91.3CPI = 80.1, Target = 91.3 88.4 83.1 80.1 -3.0 91.3 94.2 481030Declined
High needsCPI = 67.5, Target = 83.5CPI = 67.5, Target = 83.5CPI = 67.5, Target = 83.5 78.0 69.4 67.5 -1.9 83.5 89.0 483025No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.2, Target = 91.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 91.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 91.3 88.4 83.2 80.2 -3.0 91.3 94.2 28910Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 13.3 16.934425 5.4 5.23440
High needs 5.2 6.311225 14.8 15.21120
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 8.57125 10.8 14.1710
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 1.6610 24.2 26.2610
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.2 16.531025 5.7 5.23100
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 22.1 23.83440 6.3 8.13440
High needs 8.7 9.811225 15.7 19.61120
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.1 14.17125 12.2 14.1710
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 4.9610 24.2 29.5610
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.8 24.83100 5.4 8.13100
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 27.3 9.71030 4.5 4.91030
High needs 5.0 0.0300 12.5 10.03025
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.0 9.9910 4.1 5.5910
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 56.0 65.0 9.0 51.0Yes231100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 53.5 53.0 -0.5 51.0No7475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 62.0 59.0 -3.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 39.0 36.0 -3.0 51.0Yes3875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 55.0 65.0 10.0 51.0Yes209100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 51.0 38.0 -13.0 51.0No23125Below Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 43.0 38.0 -5.0 51.0No7425Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 47.0 47.0 0.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 26.5, Target = 51SGP = 26.5, Target = 51SGP = 26.5, Target = 51 36.0 26.5 -9.5 51.0No380Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 50.0 38.0 -12.0 51.0No20925Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students349348100Yes349348100Yes104104100Yes
High needs114114100Yes114114100Yes3131100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged7373100Yes7373100Yes21---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities6262100Yes6262100Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---4---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino14---14---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White313312100Yes313312100Yes9191100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles