Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Peter Noyes

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Peter Noyes

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Sudbury (02880000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Peter Noyes (02880030)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
89% - Meeting targets89

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total121267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total5822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total9.510.3-6.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage89%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 89%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage89%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 85

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 512.1 513.4 1.3 513.8 2564Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 486.1 493.1 7.0 490.0 404Exceeded Target
High needs 492.3 496.0 3.7 493.9 554Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 487.0 492.5 5.5 488.3 414Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 518.9 518.3 -0.6 520.8 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 512.2 512.9 0.7 513.8 1864Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 513.6 512.3 -1.3 514.8 2574Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 488.1 492.7 4.6 490.9 414Exceeded Target
High needs 494.6 496.6 2.0 496.0 564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 488.2 491.0 2.8 490.0 424Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 527.5 526.0 -1.5 529.9 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 512.6 510.9 -1.7 513.9 1874Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 89.8 91.0 1.2 92.0 1004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 25--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 2--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.9 91.4 1.5 92.0 704Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.1 50.0 1692Below Target
Lowest Performing 49.2 50.0 402Below Target
High needs 51.4 50.0 373Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 4--
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 54.5 50.0 263Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 18--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.6 50.0 1202Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.3 50.0 1713Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.0 50.0 413Met Target
High needs 55.6 50.0 383Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 4--
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 55.3 50.0 273Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 18--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.3 50.0 1223Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.2 3.7 -1.5 1.2 4383Met Target
Lowest Performing 7.0 9.8 -2.8 3.8 410Declined
High needs 5.2 7.8 -2.6 3.2 1030Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 19--
Students w/ disabilities 6.6 6.3 0.3 3.9 802Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 5.0 2.3 2.7 2.8 444Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 41--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.0 3.4 -1.4 0.9 3233Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 259 258100Yes 1 259 259100Yes 1 100 100100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 56 5598Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 6---- 6---- 2----
EL and Former EL 12---- 12---- 7----
Students w/ disabilities 42 4198Yes 1 42 42100Yes 1 18----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 11----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 8----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 187 18699Yes 1 187 187100Yes 1 70 70100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles