Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leeds

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Leeds

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Northampton (02100000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Leeds (02100025)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
59% - Partially meeting targets46

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-34-
Mathematics achievement44-34-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total61267.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.00410.0
Weighted total5.410.3-5.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 52%-66%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement---
Achievement total1867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total2.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 28%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage28%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 28

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.3 501.0 0.7 501.8 1592Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 474.3 479.3 5.0 479.8 263Met Target
High needs 487.4 486.3 -1.1 489.2 570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.7 483.8 -4.9 490.0 350Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 480.8 482.4 1.6 482.6 413Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino 487.7 492.6 4.9 489.2 214Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.1 502.6 -1.5 505.8 1200Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.8 499.0 2.2 498.3 1584Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 471.8 474.9 3.1 474.8 263Met Target
High needs 485.4 485.1 -0.3 487.0 571No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 484.2 481.8 -2.4 485.2 350Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 480.0 480.8 0.8 481.8 412Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino 486.6 490.7 4.1 488.2 214Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 500.1 500.8 0.7 501.8 1192Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.3 73.6 -3.7 80.0 520Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 85.8 80.1 -5.7 88.6 340Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.3 50.0 1042Below Target
Lowest Performing 46.7 50.0 262Below Target
High needs 49.3 50.0 352Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.1 50.0 202Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 47.0 50.0 262Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.2 50.0 742Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.0 50.0 1033Met Target
Lowest Performing 48.6 50.0 262Below Target
High needs 55.2 50.0 353Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.6 50.0 202Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 55.5 50.0 263Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.3 50.0 733Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.2 5.6 0.6 4.9 2482Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 11.5 15.4 -3.9 7.6 260Declined
High needs 12.6 10.3 2.3 10.3 873Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.0 19.6 -1.6 14.9 460Declined
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 9.7 9.4 0.3 5.9 532Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 0--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino 18.0 10.5 7.5 14.3 384Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.1 3.8 -0.7 1.4 1863Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 170 16698Yes 1 170 16496Yes 1 55 5396Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 65 6498Yes 1 65 6397Yes 1 18----
Econ. Disadvantaged 42 42100Yes 1 42 4198Yes 1 13----
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 44 4398Yes 1 44 4295Yes 1 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 28 2796Yes 1 28 2796Yes 1 11----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 15---- 15---- 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 122 12098Yes 1 122 11998Yes 1 35 3497Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles