Massachusetts School and District Profiles

East Meadow

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - East Meadow

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Granby (01110000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
East Meadow (01110004)
GRADES SERVED
04,05,06
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total91267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-44-
Mathematics growth34-44-
Growth total6822.58822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total7.710.3-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 75%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage85%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total7.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage92%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 70

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.1 503.6 6.5 498.6 1474Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 471.8 481.5 9.7 477.3 254Exceeded Target
High needs 486.9 493.7 6.8 488.7 484Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 489.2 492.8 3.6 490.5 344Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 477.5 481.9 4.4 479.3 214Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 497.1 504.4 7.3 498.8 1324Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.8 498.3 0.5 499.3 1472Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 473.6 482.0 8.4 476.6 254Exceeded Target
High needs 487.8 492.6 4.8 489.4 484Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.4 491.4 4.0 488.4 344Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 479.5 485.4 5.9 481.3 214Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.7 498.9 0.2 500.4 1322Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.2 76.1 1.9 76.9 473Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 74.1 76.7 2.6 76.9 433Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.2 50.0 1463Met Target
Lowest Performing 62.0 50.0 254Exceeded Target
High needs 58.4 50.0 473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 54.0 50.0 333Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 57.7 50.0 213Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 59.4 50.0 1313Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.9 50.0 1463Met Target
Lowest Performing 65.0 50.0 254Exceeded Target
High needs 60.6 50.0 474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 58.1 50.0 333Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 66.5 50.0 214Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.7 50.0 1314Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.4 3.3 -0.9 1.1 1513Met Target
Lowest Performing 4.0 8.0 -4.0 0.1 250Declined
High needs 5.0 10.2 -5.2 2.7 490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.0 13.8 -9.8 0.9 290Declined
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 9.5 -6.2 0.0 210Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.3 1.5 -0.2 0.0 1334Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 149 149100Yes 1 150 150100Yes 1 49 49100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 50 50100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 36 36100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1 16----
EL and Former EL 8---- 8---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 11---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 133 133100Yes 1 133 133100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles