Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Tynan Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Joseph P Tynan

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Joseph P Tynan (00350181)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement24----
Achievement total101260.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-44-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total8820.08822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total8.49.6-7.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 88%-100%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage94%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total8822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total7.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 100%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage100%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 55

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 488.7 493.9 5.2 490.7 944Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 466.5 478.4 11.9 471.8 204Exceeded Target
High needs 487.9 493.5 5.6 489.9 874Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.8 493.3 5.5 489.4 804Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 493.4 497.9 4.5 495.0 264Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 483.8 491.2 7.4 485.6 334Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black 487.9 491.4 3.5 489.5 394Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 489.3 494.0 4.7 491.0 234Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 20--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 487.4 492.3 4.9 489.2 954Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 461.8 478.5 16.7 465.1 204Exceeded Target
High needs 486.8 492.0 5.2 488.7 884Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 485.9 491.5 5.6 487.3 814Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 489.1 496.2 7.1 490.9 264Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 488.0 492.1 4.1 490.1 334Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black 489.1 491.1 2.0 490.9 393Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 481.8 490.4 8.6 483.4 234Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 20--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.3 61.7 0.4 64.2 322Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 29--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 25--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 6--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.3 50.0 544Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 60.5 50.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 63.6 50.0 504Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 62.1 50.0 454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black 68.4 50.0 224Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 10--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.5 50.0 544Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 66.8 50.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 67.9 50.0 504Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 70.6 50.0 454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black 60.3 50.0 224Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 10--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.6 57.6 10.0 78.2 334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 47.6 57.6 10.0 78.2 334Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 38.7 28.4 10.3 36.8 1624Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 57.1 30.0 27.1 52.4 204Exceeded Target
High needs 39.7 30.5 9.2 37.4 1514Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.8 32.0 11.8 41.4 1254Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 26.9 23.5 3.4 23.2 513Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 33.9 31.0 2.9 29.6 582Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black 41.0 23.0 18.0 37.1 614Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 48.9 40.0 8.9 45.5 454Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 33--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 98 9597Yes 1 98 98100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 90 8797Yes 1 90 90100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 83 8096Yes 1 83 83100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 28 2693No 1 28 28100Yes 1 10----
Students w/ disabilities 33 3194No 1 33 33100Yes 1 13----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 10---- 10---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 40 3998Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 14----
Hispanic/Latino 25 2496Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 6----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles