Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Newbury Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Newbury Elementary
Organization Information
District:Triton (07730000)School type:Elementary School
School:Newbury Elementary (07730020)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93, Target = 95.6CPI = 93, Target = 95.6CPI = 93, Target = 95.6 92.5 92.6 93.0 0.4 95.6 96.3 8528375On Target
High needsCPI = 82.1, Target = 88.9CPI = 82.1, Target = 88.9CPI = 82.1, Target = 88.9 81.0 81.7 82.1 0.4 88.9 90.5 797050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 91.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 91.9, Target = 92.8 92.1 92.1 91.9 -0.2 92.8 96.1 983175On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.1, Target = 85.4CPI = 76.1, Target = 85.4CPI = 76.1, Target = 85.4 75.0 76.9 76.1 -0.8 85.4 87.5 814425No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 93.2, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.2, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.2, Target = 95.9 92.9 93.1 93.2 0.1 95.9 96.5 8027075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 90.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 90.6, Target = 95.2 91.8 89.8 90.6 0.8 95.2 95.9 7428150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79, Target = 88.7CPI = 79, Target = 88.7CPI = 79, Target = 88.7 80.7 78.3 79.0 0.7 88.7 90.4 646950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.7, Target = 87.5CPI = 88.7, Target = 87.5CPI = 88.7, Target = 87.5 86.4 86.4 88.7 2.3 87.5 93.2 943175On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.3, Target = 86.5CPI = 73.3, Target = 86.5CPI = 73.3, Target = 86.5 76.8 75.0 73.3 -1.7 86.5 88.4 734325No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 91.2, Target = 95.4CPI = 91.2, Target = 95.4CPI = 91.2, Target = 95.4 92.1 90.2 91.2 1.0 95.4 96.1 7126850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 95.7 92.7 86.4 86.1 -0.3 95.7 96.4 687925No Change
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.5, Target = 95.7CPI = 86.5, Target = 95.7CPI = 86.5, Target = 95.7 92.7 86.7 86.5 -0.2 95.7 96.4 577625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.5 28.32830 2.3 1.428325
High needs 12.0 11.4700 9.3 5.77025
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.1 19.43125 0.0 0.03125
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 5.7 4.5440 11.3 9.14425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 27.1 28.12700 1.7 1.127025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.8 35.628125 4.2 3.92810
High needs 16.0 20.36925 12.0 14.5690
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.7 29.03125 5.7 6.5310
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 11.3 11.6430 17.0 18.6430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 33.0 35.82680 3.7 3.42680
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.0 19.07925 4.8 2.57925
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.7 19.77625 5.1 2.67625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 72.0 64.0 -8.0 51.0No222100Above Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 73.0 47.0 -26.0 51.0No4750Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 80.0 51.0 -29.0 51.0No2975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 72.5 64.0 -8.5 51.0No212100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 56.0 47.0 -9.0 51.0No22250Below Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 52.0 47.0 -5.0 51.0Yes4775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 55.0 48.0 -7.0 51.0No2950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 57.0 46.0 -11.0 51.0Yes21275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students284284100Yes28428299Yes8181100Yes
High needs7070100Yes706999Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged3131100Yes3131100Yes11---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities4444100Yes444398Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4-------
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino6---6---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White271271100Yes27126999Yes7878100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles