Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary M Lynch
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mary M Lynch
Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Mary M Lynch (02810140)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.3, Target = 90.3CPI = 77.3, Target = 90.3CPI = 77.3, Target = 90.3 83.3 72.8 77.3 4.5 90.3 91.7 219650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.4, Target = 89.6CPI = 76.4, Target = 89.6CPI = 76.4, Target = 89.6 82.1 72.3 76.4 4.1 89.6 91.1 538850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.4, Target = 74.6CPI = 77.4, Target = 74.6CPI = 77.4, Target = 74.6 72.3 72.3 77.4 5.1 74.6 86.2 5283100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------20--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 77.7, Target = 87.6CPI = 77.7, Target = 87.6CPI = 77.7, Target = 87.6 78.7 74.0 77.7 3.7 87.6 89.4 726550Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------11--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84, Target = 88.2CPI = 84, Target = 88.2CPI = 84, Target = 88.2 79.7 83.7 84.0 0.3 88.2 89.9 449750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 84.3, Target = 88.2CPI = 84.3, Target = 88.2CPI = 84.3, Target = 88.2 79.7 83.3 84.3 1.0 88.2 89.9 848950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.7, Target = 84.1CPI = 85.7, Target = 84.1CPI = 85.7, Target = 84.1 82.7 82.7 85.7 3.0 84.1 91.4 8784100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------20--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 85.6, Target = 87.6CPI = 85.6, Target = 87.6CPI = 85.6, Target = 87.6 78.7 84.0 85.6 1.6 87.6 89.4 886650Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------11--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.8, Target = 92.9CPI = 75.8, Target = 92.9CPI = 75.8, Target = 92.9 87.8 73.7 75.8 2.1 92.9 93.9 363050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.9, Target = 92.7CPI = 75.9, Target = 92.7CPI = 75.9, Target = 92.7 87.5 72.7 75.9 3.2 92.7 93.8 762850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.9, Target = 74.7CPI = 75.9, Target = 74.7CPI = 75.9, Target = 74.7 72.4 72.4 75.9 3.5 74.7 86.2 822875On Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino  79.8---- 89.9-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------4--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.5 8.39625 10.7 8.39625
High needs 4.0 9.18825 12.0 9.18825
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.3 9.68325 11.7 8.48325
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--20---20-
Hispanic/Latino 2.8 10.86525 8.3 7.7650
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--11---11-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.7 22.79725 6.3 4.19725
High needs 10.0 22.58925 7.0 3.48925
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.6 23.88425 7.4 2.48425
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--20---20-
Hispanic/Latino 8.3 22.76625 8.3 3.06625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--11---11-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.4 10.0300 15.4 10.03025
High needs 15.2 10.7280 18.2 10.72825
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.2 10.7280 17.2 10.72825
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--4---4-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 28.5 66.0 37.5 51.0No59100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 28.5 65.5 37.0 51.0No54100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 28.0 65.0 37.0 51.0No51100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 24.5 66.5 42.0 51.0No40100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-9--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 33.5 45.0 11.5 51.0No5975On Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 31.5 45.5 14.0 51.0No5475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 31.0 45.0 14.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 33.0 43.0 10.0 51.0No4075On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-9--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.011-
High needs- 60.011-
EL and Former EL- 60.011-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students10210098Yes10210199Yes3131100Yes
High needs939198Yes939299Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged888698Yes888799Yes2929100Yes
EL and Former EL14---14---5---
Students w/ disabilities12---12---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black21---21---7---
Hispanic/Latino696899Yes6969100Yes2020100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12---12---4---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles