Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Chace Street
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Chace Street
Organization Information
District:Somerset (02730000)School type:Elementary School
School:Chace Street (02730005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.9, Target = 94.8CPI = 85.9, Target = 94.8CPI = 85.9, Target = 94.8 91.1 82.0 85.9 3.9 94.8 95.6 5115650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77, Target = 88.9CPI = 77, Target = 88.9CPI = 77, Target = 88.9 81.0 71.9 77.0 5.1 88.9 90.5 566450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.9, Target = 81.8CPI = 82.9, Target = 81.8CPI = 82.9, Target = 81.8 80.1 80.1 82.9 2.8 81.8 90.1 793875On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.4, Target = 59.7CPI = 64.4, Target = 59.7CPI = 64.4, Target = 59.7 46.3 54.7 64.4 9.7 59.7 73.2 4933100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.7, Target = 95.2CPI = 86.7, Target = 95.2CPI = 86.7, Target = 95.2 91.7 82.1 86.7 4.6 95.2 95.9 4214550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 92CPI = 84.9, Target = 92CPI = 84.9, Target = 92 86.3 82.8 84.9 2.1 92.0 93.2 4815650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.9, Target = 85.4CPI = 71.9, Target = 85.4CPI = 71.9, Target = 85.4 75.0 71.2 71.9 0.7 85.4 87.5 326450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.3, Target = 80CPI = 78.3, Target = 80CPI = 78.3, Target = 80 78.2 78.2 78.3 0.1 80.0 89.1 583850Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56.1, Target = 62.5CPI = 56.1, Target = 62.5CPI = 56.1, Target = 62.5 50.0 57.0 56.1 -0.9 62.5 75.0 263325No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86, Target = 92.6CPI = 86, Target = 92.6CPI = 86, Target = 92.6 87.3 83.8 86.0 2.2 92.6 93.7 3914550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.6, Target = 89.9CPI = 79.6, Target = 89.9CPI = 79.6, Target = 89.9 82.7 75.0 79.6 4.6 89.9 91.4 465450Improved Below Target
High needs -------23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.5, Target = 92.1CPI = 81.5, Target = 92.1CPI = 81.5, Target = 92.1 86.4 76.6 81.5 4.9 92.1 93.2 335050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.8 9.61560 10.6 5.815625
High needs 7.7 6.3640 23.1 12.56425
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.8 10.5380 12.8 5.33825
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0330 43.8 24.23325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.3 9.01450 10.6 5.514525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.5 31.415625 9.3 7.715625
High needs 20.0 14.1640 18.5 17.2640
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.6 18.4380 12.8 13.2380
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 9.4 6.1330 31.3 33.3330
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.8 31.714525 7.9 6.214525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.8 18.55425 9.8 9.3540
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.6 18.05025 10.6 6.05025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 34.0 58.0 24.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 37.0 57.0 20.0 51.0Yes45100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 58.0 60.0 2.0 51.0No26100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 34.0 58.0 24.0 51.0Yes107100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 57.0 54.0 -3.0 51.0Yes11375On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 59.5 43.0 -16.5 51.0No4550Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 69.5 45.0 -24.5 51.0No2650Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 55.0 57.0 2.0 51.0Yes10775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16316299Yes16316299Yes5656100Yes
High needs6868100Yes6868100Yes25---
Econ. Disadvantaged4242100Yes4242100Yes15---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities3434100Yes3434100Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White15115099Yes15115099Yes5252100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles