Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hajjar Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hajjar Elementary
Organization Information
District:Billerica (00310000)School type:Elementary School
School:Hajjar Elementary (00310026)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 84.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 84.1, Target = 90.6 83.9 87.0 84.1 -2.9 90.6 92.0 432520Declined
High needsCPI = 75.8, Target = 82.1CPI = 75.8, Target = 82.1CPI = 75.8, Target = 82.1 69.3 78.9 75.8 -3.1 82.1 84.7 501000Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.6, Target = 86CPI = 78.6, Target = 86CPI = 78.6, Target = 86 84.7 84.7 78.6 -6.1 86.0 92.4 58550Declined
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.6, Target = 78.6CPI = 64.6, Target = 78.6CPI = 64.6, Target = 78.6 63.3 73.3 64.6 -8.7 78.6 81.7 50480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.5, Target = 91.4CPI = 84.5, Target = 91.4CPI = 84.5, Target = 91.4 85.2 87.3 84.5 -2.8 91.4 92.6 302010Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.3, Target = 87.4CPI = 80.3, Target = 87.4CPI = 80.3, Target = 87.4 78.4 83.3 80.3 -3.0 87.4 89.2 282520Declined
High needsCPI = 67.3, Target = 79.7CPI = 67.3, Target = 79.7CPI = 67.3, Target = 79.7 65.2 75.0 67.3 -7.7 79.7 82.6 181000Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.7, Target = 85.5CPI = 67.7, Target = 85.5CPI = 67.7, Target = 85.5 84.2 84.2 67.7 -16.5 85.5 92.1 18550Declined
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56.3, Target = 77.9CPI = 56.3, Target = 77.9CPI = 56.3, Target = 77.9 62.1 64.0 56.3 -7.7 77.9 81.1 26480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.2, Target = 88.1CPI = 80.2, Target = 88.1CPI = 80.2, Target = 88.1 79.6 82.8 80.2 -2.6 88.1 89.8 162010Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 62.4, Target = 83.3CPI = 62.4, Target = 83.3CPI = 62.4, Target = 83.3 71.4 64.2 62.4 -1.8 83.3 85.7 158725No Change
High needsCPI = 54.5, Target = 77.1CPI = 54.5, Target = 77.1CPI = 54.5, Target = 77.1 60.7 55.0 54.5 -0.5 77.1 80.4 173925No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities  60.9---- 80.5-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 61.6, Target = 83.1CPI = 61.6, Target = 83.1CPI = 61.6, Target = 83.1 71.0 63.9 61.6 -2.3 83.1 85.5 47325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.9 11.92520 2.7 7.52520
High needs 6.2 7.010025 4.1 14.01000
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.2 10.9550 0.0 12.7550
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 2.3 2.1480 7.0 20.8480
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.9 12.420125 2.7 6.02010
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.3 22.22520 5.5 12.32520
High needs 10.3 17.010025 8.2 27.01000
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.2 20.05525 0.0 27.3550
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 7.0 8.34825 18.6 43.8480
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.7 21.42010 5.9 11.92010
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.3 1.1870 19.0 23.0870
High needs 0.0 0.0390 28.0 35.9390
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 1.4 1.4730 18.9 24.7730
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 61.0 40.5 -20.5 51.0No16850Below Target
High needsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 65.0 44.5 -20.5 51.0No6850Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-37--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 62.0 40.0 -22.0 51.0No2825Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 61.0 40.0 -21.0 51.0No13925Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 61.5 37.0 -24.5 51.0No16925Below Target
High needsSGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 58.0 32.5 -25.5 51.0No6825Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-37--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 52.0 32.5 -19.5 51.0No2825Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 60.5 38.0 -22.5 51.0No13925Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.011-
High needs- 60.011-
EL and Former EL- 60.011-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students259259100Yes259259100Yes9090100Yes
High needs106106100Yes106106100Yes4141100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5858100Yes5858100Yes22---
EL and Former EL24---24---9---
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4848100Yes2020100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2-------
Asian25---25---9---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---3---
Hispanic/Latino17---17---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White203203100Yes203203100Yes7474100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles