PARENT FEEDBACK OPPORTUNITY! DESE is redesigning the Schools Near Me search engine to make information more accessible and easier to use. Please take our 5 min Survey to let us know what features would be most useful to you as a parent. Thank you.

Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bristol-Plymouth Regional Vocational Technical

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2019 Official Accountability Report - Bristol-Plymouth Regional Vocational Technical

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Bristol-Plymouth Regional Vocational Technical (08100000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
73% - Substantial progress toward targets-

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage75%71%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
73%
Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement34-34-
Achievement total101247.591267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth34-14-
Growth total5822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total4810.00410.0
Weighted total8.510.7-6.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 79%-63%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage71%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement24-24-
Achievement total91247.591267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion24----
Additional indicators total5810.00410.0
Weighted total8.610.7-7.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 80%-70%-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage75%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage72%54%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
61%
Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total71247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total61220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total5.810.7-
Percentage of possible points 54%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage54%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total81247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total111220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total3810.0
Weighted total7.710.7-
Percentage of possible points 72%-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage72%

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 98.3 0.2 99.5 3304Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.7 93.8 1.1 94.7 843Met Target
High needs 96.4 96.6 0.2 98.3 1252Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.4 98.5 0.1 100.0 844Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 93.5 92.0 -1.5 95.4 471No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 98.2 0.1 99.6 2844Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.8 92.4 0.6 93.5 3273Met Target
Lowest Performing 71.2 75.0 3.8 73.9 833Met Target
High needs 85.5 86.8 1.3 87.8 1233Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.0 91.3 1.3 92.8 832Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 75.0 77.7 2.7 77.6 463Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.6 92.6 1.0 93.3 2813Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 89.3 90.1 0.8 91.0 3193Met Target
Lowest Performing 71.2 73.8 2.6 74.7 843Met Target
High needs 85.6 86.1 0.5 88.2 1172Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.4 91.2 1.8 92.2 773Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 77.3 77.2 -0.1 80.0 451No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.4 89.8 0.4 91.3 2762Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 49.0 3032Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 31.6 771Low Growth
High needs 47.6 1172Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 44.8 772Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 51.4 453Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black- 11--
Hispanic/Latino- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 49.2 2622Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 52.1 3013Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 37.2 761Low Growth
High needs 49.9 1152Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.4 763Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 43.4 442Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black- 11--
Hispanic/Latino- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 51.5 2603Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.7 95.2 -3.5 100.0 2923Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 98.0 90.3 -7.7 100.0 1450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.3 89.8 -7.5 100.0 1080Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 98.4 81.5 -16.9 100.0 650Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.6 96.0 -2.6 100.0 2473Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 99.4 1.6 99.5 3174Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.8 98.6 2.8 99.7 1473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.6 98.2 2.6 99.9 1123Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 90.6 100.0 9.4 95.7 634Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.8 99.3 1.5 99.6 2813Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.4 0.3 -0.1 1.0 1,2784Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.0 4883Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.2 0.6 -0.6 1.1 3234Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 1.6 1.7 0.1 1.4 2380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 7--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 43--
Hispanic/Latino---- 89--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 37--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.0 1,0933Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.0 9.0 2.0 5.7 1,2910Declined
Lowest Performing 8.9 14.3 5.4 4.1 840Declined
High needs 10.9 12.6 1.7 8.6 5330Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.7 14.2 -0.5 10.1 3242Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 5.7 8.6 2.9 2.1 2213Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 9--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 41--
Hispanic/Latino---- 87--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 44--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.5 8.7 2.2 5.1 1,1023Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.5 63.5 7.0 60.9 5874Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 43.5 52.1 8.6 50.6 2384Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.7 53.8 7.1 54.4 1693Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 26.4 50.0 23.6 33.8 1044Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino---- 38--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 59.6 63.5 3.9 64.6 5012Improved Below Target

Assessment participation - All students
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 330 330100Yes 1 328 327100Yes 1 331 331100Yes 1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
Group English language arts Mathematics Science Overall
Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Total Enrolled Total Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
High needs 125 125 124 123 125 125 374 373100Yes1
Econ. Disadvantaged 84 84 83 83 84 84 251 251100Yes1
EL and Former EL 4 4 4 4 4 4 12----
Students w/ disabilities 47 47 47 46 47 47 141 14099Yes1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3----
Asian 3 3 3 3 3 3 9----
Afr. Amer./Black 12 12 12 12 12 12 36----
Hispanic/Latino 25 25 25 25 25 25 75 75100Yes1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5 5 5 5 5 5 15----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----------
White 284 284 282 281 285 285 851 850100Yes1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Bristol-Plymouth Vocational TechnicalNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles