Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bristol-Plymouth Regional Vocational Technical

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Bristol-Plymouth Regional Vocational Technical

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Bristol-Plymouth Regional Vocational Technical (08100000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
75% - Meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement24-24-
Achievement total91247.591267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion24----
Additional indicators total5810.00410.0
Weighted total8.610.7-7.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 80%-70%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage75%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total81247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total111220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total3810.0
Weighted total7.710.7-
Percentage of possible points 72%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage72%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.6 98.1 0.5 99.0 3104Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 90.7 92.7 2.0 92.5 793Met Target
High needs 94.6 96.4 1.8 96.6 1403Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.3 98.4 3.1 97.7 954Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 88.8 93.5 4.7 91.3 654Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.3 98.1 -0.2 99.6 2714Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.0 91.8 0.8 92.7 3103Met Target
Lowest Performing 66.6 71.2 4.6 69.4 794Exceeded Target
High needs 84.8 85.5 0.7 86.9 1412Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.6 90.0 4.4 88.7 954Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 72.7 75.0 2.3 75.7 663Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.5 91.6 -0.9 94.1 2711No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.9 89.3 0.4 90.6 3082Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 69.7 71.2 1.5 74.0 792Improved Below Target
High needs 81.7 85.6 3.9 84.5 1393Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 83.8 89.4 5.6 86.7 944Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 69.9 77.3 7.4 72.9 654Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.2 89.4 -0.8 92.0 2701No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.9 50.0 2893Met Target
Lowest Performing 47.5 50.0 722Below Target
High needs 54.1 50.0 1313Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.8 50.0 863Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 53.1 50.0 643Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.1 50.0 2533Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.0 50.0 2894Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 52.0 50.0 733Met Target
High needs 57.8 50.0 1333Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 58.6 50.0 873Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 55.0 50.0 663Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.8 50.0 2534Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 98.7 1.6 99.4 3174Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.8 98.0 2.2 99.9 1474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.6 97.3 1.7 100.0 1123Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 90.6 98.4 7.8 97.1 634Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.1 98.6 1.5 99.2 2814Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 97.8 0.7 98.8 3143Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.5 95.8 0.3 99.5 1653Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.5 95.6 0.1 99.8 1353Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 92.9 90.6 -2.3 97.7 530Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.4 97.8 0.4 99.2 2763Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.7 0.4 0.3 1.0 1,3034Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.7 0.8 0.9 1.5 5004Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.1 1.2 0.9 1.9 3414Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 2.0 1.6 0.4 1.8 2454Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 38--
Hispanic/Latino---- 84--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 40--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.7 0.4 0.3 1.0 1,1264Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.9 7.0 -0.1 5.8 1,2803Met Target
Lowest Performing 6.7 8.9 -2.2 0.1 790Declined
High needs 10.9 10.9 0.0 8.5 4851No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.3 14.7 -2.4 7.7 3060Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 12.2 5.7 6.5 9.1 1594Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 7--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 44--
Hispanic/Latino---- 89--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 37--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.5 6.5 0.0 5.3 1,0943Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.5 56.1 3.6 58.2 5922Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 30.7 31.8 1.1 39.2 2172Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.3 41.6 7.3 44.7 1492Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 20.5 7.4 -13.1 27.8 1080Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 21--
Hispanic/Latino---- 43--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 53.8 59.2 5.4 59.1 4983Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 312 31099Yes 1 311 310100Yes 1 312 312100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 141 14099Yes 1 141 141100Yes 1 141 141100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 95 95100Yes 1 95 95100Yes 1 95 95100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 3---- 3---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 66 6598Yes 1 66 66100Yes 1 66 66100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Asian 1---- 1---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 8----
Hispanic/Latino 17---- 17---- 17----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 11----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 273 27199Yes 1 272 271100Yes 1 273 273100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Bristol-Plymouth Vocational TechnicalNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles