Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mount Greylock

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Mount Greylock

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Mount Greylock (07150000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
72% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-44-14-
Mathematics achievement34-24-44-44-
Science achievement44----44-24-
Achievement total111267.55867.5121247.571290.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-24----
Mathematics growth14----34----
Growth total5822.53422.55822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------14----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------34----
High school completion total------71220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-34-44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------24----
Additional indicators total0410.03410.06810.04410.0
Weighted total8.610.3-4.46.7-8.810.7-6.711.2-
Percentage of possible points 83%-66%-82%-60%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan75%
Weight of non-high school results:30%
71%
Weight of high school results:70%
Criterion-referenced target percentage72%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 514.5 518.8 4.3 516.0 1824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 494.5 498.1 3.6 499.2 203Met Target
High needs---- 46--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 514.0 518.2 4.2 515.6 1694Exceeded Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 98.5 0.4 99.5 834Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.3 93.8 -0.5 96.1 201No Change
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.4 98.7 -0.7 100.0 754Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.4 505.8 1.4 505.8 1793Met Target
Lowest Performing 481.8 482.6 0.8 485.4 202Improved Below Target
High needs---- 44--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 29--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.6 505.0 0.4 506.1 1662Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.5 95.7 4.2 93.2 824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 73.9 82.5 8.6 76.7 204Exceeded Target
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.4 96.6 3.2 95.0 744Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 75.7 81.8 6.1 78.1 854Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 25--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.9 80.6 4.7 78.3 804Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 87.5 91.3 3.8 89.2 754Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 65.9 67.5 1.6 70.2 202Improved Below Target
High needs---- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.3 91.9 3.6 90.1 684Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.5 50.0 1684Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 50.8 50.0 203Met Target
High needs-- 43--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 29--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.3 50.0 1594Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.1 50.0 702Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs-- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.6 50.0 632Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 36.7 50.0 1661Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs-- 42--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 28--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 36.1 50.0 1571Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.3 50.0 703Met Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs-- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.2 50.0 633Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 92.6 92.6 0.0 94.9 941No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 40--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 0--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.3 91.8 -1.5 95.4 850Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.8 96.3 -0.5 98.5 813Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 23--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.6 96.0 -0.6 98.4 753Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.6 0.8 -0.2 1.0 3663Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 90--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 64--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 45--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.6 0.9 -0.3 1.0 3373Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.3 12.4 -1.1 10.2 1860Declined
Lowest Performing 19.0 15.0 4.0 15.4 203Met Target
High needs---- 46--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 11.3 11.6 -0.3 10.0 1721No Change

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 19.9 12.6 7.3 18.8 3564Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 31.8 20.0 11.8 25.2 204Exceeded Target
High needs---- 94--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 53--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 19.1 13.2 5.9 17.9 3174Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 71.8 75.7 3.9 77.5 1732Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 37--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 71.8 74.7 2.9 77.1 1622Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 267 26599Yes 1 267 26198Yes 1 173 16897Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 66 6598Yes 1 66 6395Yes 1 46 4496Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 45 45100Yes 1 45 4396Yes 1 31 3097Yes 1
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 33 3297Yes 1 33 3297Yes 1 23 2296Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 6---- 6---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 7---- 7---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 6----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 246 24499Yes 1 246 24098Yes 1 160 15597Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Mt Greylock Regional HighNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles