Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Rising Tide Charter Public (District)

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Rising Tide Charter Public (District)

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Rising Tide Charter Public (District) (04830000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
65% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-34-34-44-
Science achievement04----44-44-
Achievement total21267.55867.5111247.5121290.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-44----
Mathematics growth24-34-24----
Growth total4822.56822.56822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------34----
Extended engagement rate------44----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------44----
Additional indicators total4410.04410.07810.00410.0
Weighted total2.710.3-5.17.6-9.510.7-10.811.2-
Percentage of possible points 26%-67%-89%-96%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan47%
Weight of non-high school results:60%
93%
Weight of high school results:40%
Criterion-referenced target percentage65%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total01267.58870.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24----
Mathematics growth34----
Growth total5822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate---44-
High school completion total---4420.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion---34-
Additional indicators total2410.03810.0
Weighted total1.310.3-6.77.2-
Percentage of possible points 13%-93%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan13%
Weight of non-high school results:60%
93%
Weight of high school results:40%
Criterion-referenced target percentage45%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.9 502.8 0.9 503.6 3612Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 484.2 487.3 3.1 488.1 612Improved Below Target
High needs 496.1 492.2 -3.9 497.7 890Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 42--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.9 501.9 0.0 503.5 3161No Change

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 99.7 -0.3 100.0 774Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 98.8 -1.2 100.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs 100.0 98.9 -1.1 100.0 224Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 99.6 -0.4 100.0 714Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.1 503.0 -2.1 506.3 3610Declined
Lowest Performing 484.6 487.6 3.0 487.4 613Met Target
High needs 496.1 492.6 -3.5 497.5 890Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 42--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.6 502.3 -3.3 506.9 3160Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.1 96.2 2.1 95.6 783Met Target
Lowest Performing 79.8 89.3 9.5 81.8 214Exceeded Target
High needs 84.4 89.8 5.4 86.6 224Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.5 96.8 2.3 96.1 713Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 83.3 79.7 -3.6 85.5 1790Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 77.6 64.7 -12.9 80.8 460Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.2 78.4 -4.8 85.3 1600Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.9 96.7 5.8 92.3 694Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 73.8 90.5 16.7 75.9 214Exceeded Target
High needs---- 18--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.4 98.0 6.6 92.8 634Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.8 50.0 3272Below Target
Lowest Performing 54.3 50.0 613Met Target
High needs 41.9 50.0 792Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 37--
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities-- 43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.6 50.0 2892Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.3 50.0 634Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs-- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.7 50.0 594Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.5 50.0 3272Below Target
Lowest Performing 55.9 50.0 613Met Target
High needs 50.1 50.0 793Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 37--
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities-- 43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.4 50.0 2892Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.9 50.0 642Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs-- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.7 50.0 593Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 97.2 -2.8 100.0 713Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 0--
Hispanic/Latino---- 0--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 98.5 -1.5 100.0 684Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 414Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 15--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 384Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.0 3074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 704Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 2764Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.3 2.7 0.6 2.3 3754Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 4.9 1.6 3.3 1.7 614Exceeded Target
High needs 6.1 5.4 0.7 4.1 932Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 55--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.7 2.4 1.3 2.6 3274Exceeded Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.5 8.4 -2.9 4.5 2983Met Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 9.5 -9.5 0.0 210Declined
High needs 9.0 15.7 -6.7 6.3 890Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 66--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 0--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.8 7.5 -1.7 4.5 2663Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.5 78.2 5.7 75.7 1424Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 51.6 59.5 7.9 59.6 423Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 35--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 73.6 76.4 2.8 76.6 1233Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 442 43899Yes 1 442 43999Yes 1 260 25799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 113 11198Yes 1 113 11198Yes 1 70 6897Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 50 50100Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 69 6797Yes 1 69 6797Yes 1 44 4295Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Asian 10---- 10---- 6----
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 21 2095Yes 1 21 2095Yes 1 9----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 388 387100Yes 1 388 387100Yes 1 232 231100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Rising Tide Charter Public SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles