Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Millis

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Millis

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Millis (01870000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Partially meeting targets

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-44-04-
Mathematics achievement24-44-04-04-
Science achievement24----14----
Achievement total81267.58867.551247.50867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-44-24-
Growth total6822.56822.57822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-14-04-
Advanced coursework completion------04----
Additional indicators total0410.00410.01810.00410.0
Weighted total6.810.3-6.87.6-6.310.7-0.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 66%-89%-59%-12%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan78%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
36%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage65%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-04-
Mathematics achievement44-04-
Science achievement44-04-
Achievement total121267.501270.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34----
Mathematics growth34----
Growth total6822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---44-
Extended engagement rate---04-
Annual dropout rate---44-
High school completion total---81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion---24-
Additional indicators total0410.06810.0
Weighted total9.510.3-2.211.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-19%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan92%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
19%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage70%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.8 505.8 6.0 501.6 5884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 481.9 487.5 5.6 486.3 1114Exceeded Target
High needs 487.4 494.9 7.5 488.9 1554Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 93--
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities---- 80--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 50--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 499.6 506.1 6.5 501.6 4934Exceeded Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.7 97.9 -1.8 100.0 974Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 91.7 -8.3 100.0 240Declined
High needs 99.0 91.3 -7.7 100.0 230Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 98.2 -1.8 100.0 844Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.4 504.8 0.4 506.1 5902Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 483.8 487.0 3.2 486.4 1114Exceeded Target
High needs 491.2 493.7 2.5 492.7 1564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 93--
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities---- 81--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 50--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.6 505.3 0.7 506.3 4952Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 94.5 -2.6 98.9 950Declined
Lowest Performing 93.2 83.7 -9.5 96.0 230Declined
High needs 88.5 79.5 -9.0 91.0 220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.8 95.4 -1.4 98.6 821No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.5 76.9 0.4 78.3 1962Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 56.5 65.8 9.3 58.8 574Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 36--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.9 77.1 1.2 77.7 1693Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.3 94.1 -2.2 98.1 931No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 88.1 85.2 -2.9 90.4 220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.3 96.3 0.0 98.1 801No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.3 50.0 4643Met Target
Lowest Performing 56.2 50.0 1113Met Target
High needs 51.2 50.0 1223Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 72--
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 61--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 39--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.8 50.0 3893Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.2 50.0 923Met Target
Lowest Performing 41.7 50.0 222Below Target
High needs-- 18--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.3 50.0 803Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.2 50.0 4683Met Target
Lowest Performing 53.4 50.0 1113Met Target
High needs 51.3 50.0 1213Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 71--
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 61--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 39--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.2 50.0 3933Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.6 50.0 904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 43.5 50.0 212Below Target
High needs-- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.7 50.0 784Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.0 96.7 3.7 95.0 914Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 81.8 92.3 10.5 85.9 264Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 92.3 97.6 5.3 94.4 834Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.9 95.0 -0.9 97.5 1003Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 89.7 84.8 -4.9 93.2 330Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 28--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.6 94.5 -1.1 97.4 910Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 3904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 4.3 0.0 4.3 3.9 734Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 38--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.9 0.0 0.9 1.0 3494Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.0 5.7 -1.7 2.9 7660Declined
Lowest Performing 8.6 9.9 -1.3 6.5 1110Declined
High needs 9.9 10.8 -0.9 8.0 2040Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 90--
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 102--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 63--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 34--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.3 4.2 -0.9 2.3 6433Met Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.4 8.9 -0.5 7.3 4031No Change
Lowest Performing 4.5 13.0 -8.5 2.4 230Declined
High needs 22.7 19.8 2.9 20.8 864Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 47--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 48--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 8.6 9.0 -0.4 7.6 3541No Change

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.7 80.5 -2.2 87.3 2050Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 45.5 48.4 2.9 52.5 312Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.1 82.1 -1.0 88.2 1841No Change

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 690 687100Yes 1 690 687100Yes 1 295 294100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 182 18099Yes 1 182 18099Yes 1 82 8199Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 109 10899Yes 1 109 10798Yes 1 52 5198Yes 1
EL and Former EL 16---- 16---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 94 9298Yes 1 94 9399Yes 1 43 4298Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 14---- 14---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 7----
Hispanic/Latino 60 5998Yes 1 60 5998Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 26 26100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 8----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 579 577100Yes 1 579 577100Yes 1 254 253100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Clyde F BrownNot requiring assistance or intervention
Millis High SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Millis MiddleNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles