Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Millis High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Millis High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Millis (01870000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Millis High School (01870505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
34% - Partially meeting targets78

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-04-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement14-04-
Achievement total61247.501267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-24-
Growth total7822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate04----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total81220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total3810.00410.0
Weighted total6.310.7-0.910.3-
Percentage of possible points 59%-9%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage34%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total0870.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth---
Mathematics growth---
Growth total---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total3810.0
Weighted total1.98.8-
Percentage of possible points 22%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage22%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.7 97.9 -1.8 100.0 964Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 91.7 -8.3 100.0 240Declined
High needs 98.8 90.9 -7.9 100.0 220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 98.2 -1.8 100.0 834Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.2 94.9 -2.3 98.7 941No Change
Lowest Performing 93.2 83.7 -9.5 95.2 230Declined
High needs 88.1 81.0 -7.1 90.3 210Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.0 96.0 -1.0 98.6 811No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 94.1 -2.1 97.6 931No Change
Lowest Performing 87.5 82.3 -5.2 89.6 240Declined
High needs---- 22--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.3 96.3 0.0 97.7 801No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.2 50.0 923Met Target
Lowest Performing 41.7 50.0 222Below Target
High needs-- 18--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.3 50.0 803Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.6 50.0 904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 43.5 50.0 212Below Target
High needs-- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.7 50.0 784Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.8 97.8 4.0 95.0 904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 83.3 96.0 12.7 86.5 254Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 0--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 93.2 97.6 4.4 94.6 834Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.8 94.8 -1.0 96.8 970Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 88.9 83.3 -5.6 91.7 300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 25--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.5 94.3 -1.2 96.6 880Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 3904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 4.3 0.0 4.3 3.9 734Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 38--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.9 0.0 0.9 1.0 3494Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.1 8.6 -0.5 7.1 3963Met Target
Lowest Performing 4.5 13.0 -8.5 0.0 230Declined
High needs 22.2 19.0 3.2 19.5 793Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 41--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 41--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 8.5 8.6 -0.1 7.2 3493Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.7 80.5 -2.2 85.9 2050Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 50.0 48.4 -1.6 58.0 310Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.1 82.1 -1.0 86.1 1843Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 98 98100Yes 1 98 9698Yes 1 98 98100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 24 24100Yes 1 24 2396Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 15---- 15---- 15----
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 12---- 12---- 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 8---- 8---- 8----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 84 84100Yes 1 84 8298Yes 1 84 84100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles