Kevin F Andrews, Principal Mailing Address: 290 Castle Road Nahant, MA 01908
Phone: (781) 581-1600 FAX: (781) 581-0440 Website: http://www.johnsonschool.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
51
51
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
13.8 to 1
13.8 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Subgroup by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
2016 PARCC Results by Subgroup by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
5
--
--
5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
4
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
19
100
21
53
21
5
0
92.1
--
--
19
100
21
53
21
5
0
92.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
8
--
--
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
11
100
36
55
9
0
0
97.7
--
--
11
100
36
55
9
0
0
97.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
15
100
27
53
13
7
0
93.3
--
--
15
100
27
53
13
7
0
93.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
16
100
25
50
19
6
0
92.2
--
--
16
100
25
50
19
6
0
92.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
19
100
21
53
21
5
0
92.1
--
--
19
100
21
53
21
5
0
92.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
5
--
--
5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
4
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
19
100
26
53
16
5
0
97.4
--
--
19
100
26
53
16
5
0
97.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
8
--
--
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
11
100
36
36
18
9
0
95.5
--
--
11
100
36
36
18
9
0
95.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
15
100
33
53
13
0
0
100.0
--
--
15
100
33
53
13
0
0
100.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
16
100
31
50
13
6
0
96.9
--
--
16
100
31
50
13
6
0
96.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
19
100
26
53
16
5
0
97.4
--
--
19
100
26
53
16
5
0
97.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
5
--
4
5
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
3
--
2
3
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
13
100
31
38
15
15
0
84.6
--
12
13
100
31
38
15
15
0
84.6
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
10
100
40
40
10
10
0
90.0
--
9
10
100
40
40
10
10
0
90.0
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
5
--
5
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
12
100
42
33
17
8
0
87.5
--
12
12
100
42
33
17
8
0
87.5
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
13
100
31
38
15
15
0
84.6
--
12
13
100
31
38
15
15
0
84.6
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
15
100
33
33
20
13
0
83.3
--
14
15
100
33
33
20
13
0
83.3
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
5
--
4
5
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
3
--
2
3
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
13
100
8
46
38
8
0
80.8
--
12
13
100
8
46
38
8
0
80.8
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
10
100
20
40
30
10
0
82.5
--
9
10
100
20
40
30
10
0
82.5
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
5
--
5
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
12
100
17
50
25
8
0
87.5
--
12
12
100
17
50
25
8
0
87.5
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
13
100
8
46
38
8
0
80.8
--
12
13
100
8
46
38
8
0
80.8
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
15
100
13
40
33
13
0
80.0
--
14
15
100
13
40
33
13
0
80.0
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
4
--
4
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
12
100
0
67
33
0
0
95.8
--
12
12
100
0
67
33
0
0
95.8
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
8
--
8
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
5
--
5
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
11
100
9
73
18
0
0
100.0
--
11
11
100
9
73
18
0
0
100.0
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
11
100
0
73
27
0
0
95.5
--
11
11
100
0
73
27
0
0
95.5
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
13
100
8
62
31
0
0
96.2
--
13
13
100
8
62
31
0
0
96.2
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
4
--
4
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
12
100
17
25
50
8
0
85.4
--
12
12
100
17
25
50
8
0
85.4
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
8
--
8
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
5
--
5
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
11
100
18
36
45
0
0
90.9
--
11
11
100
18
36
45
0
0
90.9
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
11
100
18
27
45
9
0
88.6
--
11
11
100
18
27
45
9
0
88.6
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
13
100
15
31
46
8
0
86.5
--
13
13
100
15
31
46
8
0
86.5
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
7
--
7
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
6
--
6
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
22
100
55
32
14
0
0
97.7
90.0
22
22
100
55
32
14
0
0
97.7
90.0
22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
9
--
9
9
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
15
100
53
40
7
0
0
98.3
--
15
15
100
53
40
7
0
0
98.3
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
22
100
55
36
9
0
0
98.9
92.0
22
22
100
55
36
9
0
0
98.9
92.0
22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
18
100
56
33
11
0
0
98.6
--
18
18
100
56
33
11
0
0
98.6
--
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
24
100
50
38
13
0
0
97.9
91.0
24
24
100
50
38
13
0
0
97.9
91.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
31
100
29
58
6
6
0
95.2
85.0
31
31
100
29
58
6
6
0
95.2
85.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
7
--
7
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
6
--
6
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
2
--
2
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
22
100
18
59
18
5
0
94.3
71.0
22
22
100
18
59
18
5
0
94.3
71.0
22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
9
--
9
9
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
15
100
13
67
20
0
0
98.3
--
15
15
100
13
67
20
0
0
98.3
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
22
100
18
59
18
5
0
94.3
69.0
22
22
100
18
59
18
5
0
94.3
69.0
22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
18
100
22
56
17
6
0
93.1
--
18
18
100
22
56
17
6
0
93.1
--
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
24
100
17
58
21
4
0
94.8
71.0
24
24
100
17
58
21
4
0
94.8
71.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
31
100
3
45
39
13
0
83.1
30.0
31
31
100
3
45
39
13
0
83.1
30.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
21
100
19
38
38
5
0
86.9
--
15
21
100
19
38
38
5
0
86.9
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
13
100
31
38
31
0
0
92.3
--
10
13
100
31
38
31
0
0
92.3
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
11
100
0
36
55
9
0
79.5
--
6
11
100
0
36
55
9
0
79.5
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
4
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
66
100
30
45
20
5
0
93.2
68.0
46
66
100
30
45
20
5
0
93.2
68.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
35
100
26
49
20
6
0
92.1
61.0
26
35
100
26
49
20
6
0
92.1
61.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
36
100
36
42
19
3
0
93.8
77.0
25
36
100
36
42
19
3
0
93.8
77.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
60
100
37
47
13
3
0
95.4
74.0
45
60
100
37
47
13
3
0
95.4
74.0
45
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
58
100
31
47
17
5
0
93.1
62.0
41
58
100
31
47
17
5
0
93.1
62.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
71
100
31
45
20
4
0
93.0
68.0
51
71
100
31
45
20
4
0
93.0
68.0
51
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
90
100
27
56
12
6
0
94.7
81.0
66
90
100
27
56
12
6
0
94.7
81.0
66
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
21
100
5
43
33
19
0
82.1
--
15
21
100
5
43
33
19
0
82.1
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
13
100
8
54
31
8
0
92.3
--
10
13
100
8
54
31
8
0
92.3
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
11
100
0
27
45
27
0
75.0
--
6
11
100
0
27
45
27
0
75.0
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
4
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
66
100
18
48
27
6
0
90.9
56.0
46
66
100
18
48
27
6
0
90.9
56.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
35
100
20
49
26
6
0
91.4
62.0
26
35
100
20
49
26
6
0
91.4
62.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
36
100
17
47
28
8
0
90.3
53.0
25
36
100
17
47
28
8
0
90.3
53.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
60
100
22
52
23
3
0
93.8
53.0
45
60
100
22
52
23
3
0
93.8
53.0
45
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
58
100
21
47
26
7
0
90.5
57.0
41
58
100
21
47
26
7
0
90.5
57.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
71
100
18
48
27
7
0
90.8
55.0
51
71
100
18
48
27
7
0
90.8
55.0
51
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
90
100
8
51
30
10
1
86.9
47.0
67
90
100
8
51
30
10
1
86.9
47.0
67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Johnson
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements (MR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
79
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
79
Met Target
High needs
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
88
Met Target
Johnson: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
90.4
94.7
93.0
-1.7
94.4
95.2
85
71
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
90.4
94.6
93.2
-1.4
94.4
95.2
80
66
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
87.0
86.9
90.8
3.9
92.4
93.5
75
71
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
86.7
87.5
90.9
3.4
92.2
93.4
68
66
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
35.6
45.1
71
25
1.1
1.4
71
0
High needs
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
35.9
43.9
66
25
1.3
1.5
66
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
33.3
42.3
71
25
4.4
2.8
71
25
High needs
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
32.1
40.9
66
25
5.1
3.0
66
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
High needs
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
81.0
68.0
-13.0
51.0
No
51
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
82.0
67.5
-14.5
51.0
No
46
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
47.0
55.0
8.0
51.0
Yes
51
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
43.0
56.0
13.0
51.0
Yes
46
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
4
-
High needs
-
60.0
4
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
4
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
71
71
100
Yes
71
71
100
Yes
13
-
-
-
High needs
21
-
-
-
21
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
13
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
11
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
66
66
100
Yes
66
66
100
Yes
12
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.