Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Paul F Doyon Memorial

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page generate pdf

This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.

Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)

About the Data
Enrollment (2015-16)
 School District State
412 1,844 953,429
Race/Ethnicity (%)
African American or Black 1.5 1.3 8.8
Asian 2.4 1.9 6.5
Hispanic or Latino 4.4 4.1 18.6
Multi-race, Non-Hispanic 3.2 3.9 3.2
Native American 0.0 0.1 0.2
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0 0.1
White 88.6 88.8 62.7
Gender (%)
Male 48.8 49.1 51.2
Female 51.2 50.9 48.8
Selected Populations (%)
English Language Learner 2.2 1.8 9.0
Economically Disadvantaged 11.7 11.9 27.4
Students w/Disabilities 14.1 14.3 17.2
First Language Not English 2.7 2.8 19.0

Grades Offered:
PK, K, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05
Educator Data (2015-16)
 SchoolDistrictState
Total # of Teachers 32.2 158.7 72,384.1
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment 100.0 99.4 97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas 169 833 348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified 100.0 100.0 96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified 0.0 0.0 3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.8 to 1 11.6 to 1 13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers- 1.2 0.9
 

2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject

More about the data
GRADE LEVEL 3 - READING
 
 
GRADE LEVEL 3 - MATHEMATICS
 
 
GRADE LEVEL 4 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
 
 
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
 
 
GRADE LEVEL 5 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
 
 
GRADE LEVEL 5 - MATHEMATICS
 
 
GRADE LEVEL 5 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
 
 
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
 
 
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
 
 
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
 

2016 Accountability Data - Paul F Doyon Memorial

Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level

Level 2

Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:Percentile in school type = 66Percentile in school type = 66  66
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group
(Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher - Red Marker
Less progressMore progress
All studentsPPI = 61, Target = 75PPI = 61, Target = 75PPI = 61, Target = 75 61Did Not Meet Target
High needsPPI = 63, Target = 75PPI = 63, Target = 75PPI = 63, Target = 75 63Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -
EL and Former EL -
Students w/ disabilitiesPPI = 45, Target = 75PPI = 45, Target = 75PPI = 45, Target = 75 45Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -
Asian -
Afr. Amer./Black -
Hispanic/Latino -
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -
WhitePPI = 60, Target = 75PPI = 60, Target = 75PPI = 60, Target = 75 60Did Not Meet Target
 

Paul F Doyon Memorial:
Accountability Data Detail

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 86.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 86.3, Target = 94.6 90.7 89.9 86.3 -3.6 94.6 95.4 531940Declined
High needsCPI = 61.4, Target = 85.8CPI = 61.4, Target = 85.8CPI = 61.4, Target = 85.8 75.6 71.5 61.4 -10.1 85.8 87.8 6460Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 55.9, Target = 85.8CPI = 55.9, Target = 85.8CPI = 55.9, Target = 85.8 75.7 66.4 55.9 -10.5 85.8 87.9 27340Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 87.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 87.3, Target = 94.6 90.8 90.5 87.3 -3.2 94.6 95.4 461750Declined
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.9, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.9, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.9, Target = 93.1 88.2 83.8 86.9 3.1 93.1 94.1 5519550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.2, Target = 82.4CPI = 62.2, Target = 82.4CPI = 62.2, Target = 82.4 69.9 61.5 62.2 0.7 82.4 85.0 84750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.1, Target = 84.5CPI = 57.1, Target = 84.5CPI = 57.1, Target = 84.5 73.5 55.5 57.1 1.6 84.5 86.8 283550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.2, Target = 93CPI = 88.2, Target = 93CPI = 88.2, Target = 93 88.0 84.7 88.2 3.5 93.0 94.0 5217650Improved Below Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.4, Target = 94.2CPI = 88.4, Target = 94.2CPI = 88.4, Target = 94.2 90.0 90.0 88.4 -1.6 94.2 95.0 776725No Change
High needs -------9--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------1--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.8, Target = 94.1CPI = 88.8, Target = 94.1CPI = 88.8, Target = 94.1 89.8 90.1 88.8 -1.3 94.1 94.9 696025No Change
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 18.0 14.41940 3.2 7.21940
High needs 2.0 2.24625 14.0 28.3460
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.93425 21.9 35.3340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.0 13.71750 2.9 7.41750
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 28.5 40.019525 7.7 7.21950
High needs 10.0 8.5470 30.0 29.8470
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 2.9350 34.4 34.3350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.9 39.817625 5.9 5.117625
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 28.2 23.9670 2.4 1.56725
High needs--9---9-
Econ. Disadvantaged--1---1-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.2 21.7600 2.5 1.76025
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 54.0 58.0 4.0 51.0No13375On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 34.0 53.0 19.0 51.0No25100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-5--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 54.5 57.5 3.0 51.0No12075On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 33.0 67.0 34.0 51.0Yes133100Above Target
High needsSGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 51 30.0 68.5 38.5 51.0No26100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-5--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 32.5 70.0 37.5 51.0Yes120100Above Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.08-
High needs- 60.08-
EL and Former EL- 60.08-
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students20119899Yes20119999Yes706999Yes
High needs525096Yes525198Yes11---
Econ. Disadvantaged13---13---2---
EL and Former EL7---7---2---
Students w/ disabilities373595Yes373697Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18017798Yes18017899Yes626198Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

 

2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group
Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level


About the Data

NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.

The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.

GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
All Students 23514508218100 2218356832100
Stud. w/ Disab 209220554518 186212336713
LEP 20011244569 18918326811
African American/Black 21732565357 206218514915
Asian/Pacific Islander 249316889116 238195381195
Hispanic/Latino 215325613919 208321544626
White 2421758891165 2321146792149
Econ. Disadvantaged 220529673342 209321564455

GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
All Students 25113549010100 2407398119100
Stud. w/ Disab 231425742618 217216544613
LEP 22321765359 218115574311
African American/Black 23012673277 224119653515
Asian/Pacific Islander 27338819826 256226190105
Hispanic/Latino 232328742619 230326732726
White 256156295565 2481051901049
Econ. Disadvantaged 236431802042 229224722855

GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
All Students 2746468317100 2643337525100
Stud. w/ Disab 245115544618 229#8366412
LEP 225#635655 223#328726
African American/Black 25211863379 247115584215
Asian/Pacific Islander 290186490107 27995085156
Hispanic/Latino 249#17613914 253120653525
White 281753901067 273442841651
Econ. Disadvantaged 260328712944 253120643652

GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
All Students 29718518119100 2818327030100
Stud. w/ Disab 264316514918 24618326812
LEP 25121038626 2461531696
African American/Black 26842254469 260112475315
Asian/Pacific Islander 32444739467 305255886146
Hispanic/Latino 271424613915 269319604025
White 3042059881266 2911042811951
Econ. Disadvantaged 279731673343 268218584252

Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students

The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.

Grade/Subject # in Sample % of Sample - Students with Disabilities % of Sample - English Language Learners % of Students Excluded from Original Sample
Grade 4 Reading 3,1001893
Grade 4 Mathematics 3,2001892
Grade 8 Reading 3,0001852
Grade 8 Mathematics 3,1001862

School and District Profiles