• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation
• PARCC Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 53 47 47 46 PROFICIENT 43 47 42 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 4 7 10 FAILING 0 1 3 4

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 58 49 47 51 PROFICIENT 24 32 38 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 12 8 12 FAILING 5 7 7 12

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 31 25 11 21 PROFICIENT 47 56 65 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 15 23 15 FAILING 3 4 1 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 5 PROFICIENT 60 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 21 WARNING 8 6

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 12 PROFICIENT 31 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 31 WARNING 19 19

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 2 2 1 2 PROFICIENT 33 30 41 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 53 44 43 43 WARNING 13 24 15 34

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 4 PROFICIENT 55 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 37 WARNING 11 11

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 9 PROFICIENT 27 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 24 WARNING 25 41

NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.