• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 40 46 53 48 PROFICIENT 53 48 43 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 5 2 6 FAILING 2 1 2 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 46 43 52 60 PROFICIENT 37 40 34 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 14 9 9 FAILING 4 3 6 4

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 21 29 31 PROFICIENT 61 65 58 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 14 10 9 FAILING 2 0 3 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 9 15 8 PROFICIENT 67 76 66 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 11 16 15 WARNING 3 4 3 7

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 29 22 13 PROFICIENT 34 33 46 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 31 19 31 WARNING 18 6 12 16

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 2 2 3 PROFICIENT 36 42 31 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 47 54 43 WARNING 12 9 14 14

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 7 4 4 PROFICIENT 69 67 61 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 21 30 30 WARNING 2 5 5 12

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 20 23 13 PROFICIENT 42 41 25 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 30 32 31 WARNING 15 8 20 22

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 17 15 17 PROFICIENT 65 53 44 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 25 26 17 WARNING 5 5 15 4

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 31 24 28 PROFICIENT 36 32 34 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 25 26 28 WARNING 9 12 17 7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 13 18 18 PROFICIENT 51 47 51 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 29 24 22 WARNING 8 11 7 9

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 22 31 25 PROFICIENT 33 34 29 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 26 33 27 WARNING 13 17 7 9

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 18 21 16 PROFICIENT 45 35 39 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 34 32 40 WARNING 12 13 7 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 8 8 10 PROFICIENT 34 55 45 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 27 35 38 WARNING 17 10 12 13

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 21 7 13 PROFICIENT 38 36 36 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 36 46 45 WARNING 13 7 12 12

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 11 7 8 PROFICIENT 55 59 51 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 25 35 27 WARNING 6 6 6 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 29 28 17 PROFICIENT 60 33 41 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 29 27 27 WARNING 3 9 5 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.