• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation
• PARCC Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 61 42 47 60 PROFICIENT 39 56 53 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0 2 0 0 FAILING 0 0 0 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 85 92 74 79 PROFICIENT 10 6 19 14 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 2 6 5 FAILING 0 0 0 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 46 52 43 38 PROFICIENT 53 39 53 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 8 4 10 FAILING 0 0 0 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 16 PROFICIENT 62 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 14 WARNING 5 5

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 22 PROFICIENT 40 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 29 WARNING 10 6

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 5 3 1 10 PROFICIENT 51 32 43 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 43 49 34 WARNING 2 22 6 6

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 9 PROFICIENT 63 76 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 9 WARNING 3 6

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 18 PROFICIENT 38 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 21 WARNING 11 11

NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.