• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 45 53 59 PROFICIENT 69 49 39 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 3 4 6 4 FAILING 2 2 2 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 59 60 61 69 PROFICIENT 29 27 25 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 8 7 7 FAILING 3 4 6 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 30 45 43 PROFICIENT 64 56 40 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 12 14 10 FAILING 2 2 1 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 21 21 16 PROFICIENT 61 66 60 73 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 11 14 8 WARNING 3 3 5 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 46 40 39 35 PROFICIENT 26 32 26 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 19 20 26 WARNING 13 10 15 9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 11 7 17 PROFICIENT 54 53 48 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 27 36 29 WARNING 6 9 9 3

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 17 25 20 PROFICIENT 61 63 61 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 18 12 9 WARNING 5 3 2 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 32 37 33 PROFICIENT 40 30 35 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 26 20 22 WARNING 12 11 8 9

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 26 25 21 PROFICIENT 57 58 57 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 13 16 11 WARNING 5 4 2 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 47 42 44 PROFICIENT 30 31 35 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 13 16 15 WARNING 12 9 8 12

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 24 24 23 PROFICIENT 60 52 51 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 19 21 23 WARNING 2 5 5 3

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 31 39 44 PROFICIENT 35 38 34 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 18 17 17 WARNING 8 13 10 8

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 35 24 28 PROFICIENT 49 38 41 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 22 30 27 WARNING 3 5 5 3

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 20 17 21 PROFICIENT 51 54 45 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 18 31 24 WARNING 4 8 7 5

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 21 20 24 PROFICIENT 37 38 43 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 31 30 31 WARNING 8 11 7 5

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 20 17 19 PROFICIENT 56 58 54 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 19 28 26 WARNING 3 4 1 5

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 33 36 31 PROFICIENT 54 38 40 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 21 19 18 WARNING 9 8 6 8

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.