Massachusetts School and District Profiles

O'Donnell Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Hugh Roe O'Donnell

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Hugh Roe O'Donnell (00350141)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
77% - Meeting targets29

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement24----
Achievement total61260.08890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44----
Mathematics growth44----
Growth total8820.0---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total5.69.6-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 58%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage77%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total81267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total8822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total7.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 70%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage70%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 41

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 485.6 489.1 3.5 487.1 1024Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 467.0 482.1 15.1 472.5 204Exceeded Target
High needs 484.9 489.4 4.5 486.7 984Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 484.6 488.7 4.1 485.9 644Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 484.6 490.0 5.4 485.9 834Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino 485.6 489.4 3.8 487.1 934Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 4--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 489.4 487.9 -1.5 490.9 1060Declined
Lowest Performing 476.4 486.4 10.0 479.4 204Exceeded Target
High needs 488.6 487.5 -1.1 490.2 1020Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.3 486.5 -1.8 489.3 660Declined
EL and Former EL 489.8 487.5 -2.3 491.3 870Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino 489.5 487.5 -2.0 491.1 960Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 4--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.4 50.0 0.6 52.1 332Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 45.3 50.0 4.7 48.7 334Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.8 52.2 4.4 51.6 233Met Target
EL and Former EL 47.7 45.5 -2.2 50.6 281No Change
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino 48.7 49.2 0.5 51.5 322Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.7 50.0 544Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 61.2 50.0 534Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 61.2 50.0 334Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 63.4 50.0 464Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino 61.1 50.0 484Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 3--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.8 50.0 554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 61.7 50.0 544Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 66.1 50.0 334Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 60.3 50.0 474Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino 61.6 50.0 494Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 3--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.9 69.4 15.5 70.2 1214Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 53.9 69.4 15.5 70.2 1214Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.4 13.3 -1.9 10.1 2030Declined
Lowest Performing 4.8 10.0 -5.2 0.9 200Declined
High needs 11.7 13.0 -1.3 9.4 1920Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.9 17.4 -5.5 8.8 1150Declined
EL and Former EL 10.7 11.6 -0.9 8.0 1640Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 10.1 13.0 -2.9 6.4 1850Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 8--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 122 11695Yes 1 123 12299Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 118 11295Yes 1 119 11899Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 80 7695Yes 1 81 8099Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 102 9696Yes 2 103 10299Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1
Students w/ disabilities 17---- 17---- 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 112 10796Yes 1 113 11299Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 4---- 4---- 1----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles