Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary D Altavesta

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Mary D Altavesta

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Woburn (03470000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Mary D Altavesta (03470065)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-24-
Mathematics achievement14-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total91260.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-14-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total0410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total6.89.6-5.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 71%-66%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage69%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage86%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 49

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.0 502.1 2.1 501.5 1074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 473.2 476.7 3.5 477.9 202Improved Below Target
High needs 489.1 492.9 3.8 490.7 584Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.3 498.2 4.9 494.7 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities 480.0 482.9 2.9 481.7 254Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 499.6 503.9 4.3 501.2 484Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.2 501.7 -0.5 503.6 1071No Change
Lowest Performing 470.3 475.5 5.2 473.9 204Exceeded Target
High needs 488.0 490.9 2.9 489.7 584Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.3 494.0 3.7 491.4 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities 477.7 478.2 0.5 479.8 252Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.4 501.0 -0.4 502.9 481No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 84.7 91.1 6.4 87.1 314Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 13--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.5 50.0 653Met Target
Lowest Performing 39.3 50.0 201Below Target
High needs 47.5 50.0 372Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 9--
Hispanic/Latino-- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.8 50.0 293Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.8 50.0 654Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 53.4 50.0 203Met Target
High needs 59.3 50.0 373Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 9--
Hispanic/Latino-- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.9 50.0 294Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.7 53.8 -31.9 70.2 260Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.6 12.7 -1.1 10.5 2210Declined
Lowest Performing 10.0 15.0 -5.0 6.4 200Declined
High needs 14.9 18.4 -3.5 12.5 1140Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.4 20.4 2.0 18.9 542Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 46--
Students w/ disabilities 5.9 14.3 -8.4 2.6 350Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 41--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 25--
Hispanic/Latino---- 36--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 10.9 14.1 -3.2 9.6 990Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 114 114100Yes 1 114 114100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 64 64100Yes 1 64 64100Yes 1 15----
Econ. Disadvantaged 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 7----
EL and Former EL 26 26100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 6----
Students w/ disabilities 26 26100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 6----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 5---- 5---- 1----
Asian 16---- 16---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 14---- 14---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 51 51100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1 14----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles