Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary K. Goode Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Mary K. Goode Elementary School

Organization Information

District:

Middleborough (01820000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Mary K. Goode Elementary School (01820010)

Grades served:

01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.4	83.7	84.6	0.9	87.6	90.7	45	345	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		69.5	72.4	69.7	-2.7	79.7	84.8	23	132	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.8	78.8	74.2	-4.6	80.6	89.4	37	97	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		53.6	57.8	53.7	-4.1	69.1	76.8	21	68	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.9	83.7	84.8	1.1	87.9	91.0	31	305	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.0	83.0	87.8	4.8	84.0	88.0	61	347	100	Above Target
High needs		63.6	72.6	78.9	6.3	75.7	81.8	63	133	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.4	78.4	81.4	3.0	80.2	89.2	72	98	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		48.0	59.0	69.1	10.1	65.3	74.0	63	68	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		76.5	83.1	87.5	4.4	84.3	88.3	47	307	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.4	79.5	81.5	2.0	88.3	91.2	52	112	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		74.0	72.8	72.8	0.0	82.7	87.0	68	46	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.7	81.7	75.7	-6.0	83.2	90.9	80	35	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		59.1	-	-	-	-	79.6	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.3	79.4	81.6	2.2	88.9	91.7	34	98	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.7	15.4	345	25	6.2	8.1	345	0
High needs	2.2	6.1	132	25	14.8	20.5	132	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.2	7.2	97	25	8.6	16.5	97	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.9	68	25	31.1	33.8	68	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.4	15.4	305	25	6.3	8.2	305	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	25.9	31.7	347	25	7.3	6.1	347	25
High needs	13.2	15.0	133	25	14.7	10.5	133	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	17.9	19.4	98	0	10.5	8.2	98	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.6	1.5	68	0	26.2	20.6	68	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	26.0	32.2	307	25	7.5	6.8	307	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.2	12.5	112	25	7.1	2.7	112	25
High needs	4.3	6.5	46	25	10.9	4.3	46	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.7	8.6	35	25	3.3	2.9	35	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.2	11.2	98	25	6.7	3.1	98	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.0	53.5	3.5	51.0	Yes	224	75	On Target
High needs		50.0	51.0	1.0	51.0	No	85	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	50.0	0.0	51.0	No	65	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		34.0	52.0	18.0	51.0	No	38	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		49.0	53.5	4.5	51.0	Yes	198	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.0	63.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	227	100	Above Target
High needs		53.5	64.0	10.5	51.0	Yes	87	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.5	63.0	4.5	51.0	No	67	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	57.5	13.5	51.0	Yes	38	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		59.0	63.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	201	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	4.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	4.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	4.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	360	351	98	Yes	360	353	98	Yes	114	114	100	Yes
High needs	141	135	96	Yes	141	136	96	Yes	47	47	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	103	100	97	Yes	103	101	98	Yes	36	36	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	71	68	96	Yes	71	68	96	Yes	21	21	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	319	311	97	Yes	319	313	98	Yes	100	100	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.