Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fairhaven High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Fairhaven High
Organization Information
District:Fairhaven (00940000)School type:High School
School:Fairhaven High (00940505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 98.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 98.2, Target = 96.3 93.7 97.1 98.2 1.1 96.3 96.9 53141100Above Target
High needsCPI = 94.1, Target = 92.1CPI = 94.1, Target = 92.1CPI = 94.1, Target = 92.1 86.4 93.4 94.1 0.7 92.1 93.2 4534100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.8, Target = 96.7CPI = 98.8, Target = 96.7CPI = 98.8, Target = 96.7 94.3 97.3 98.8 1.5 96.7 97.2 53123100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.4, Target = 95.3CPI = 95.4, Target = 95.3 91.9 95.4 95.4 0.0 95.3 96.0 6914175On Target
High needsCPI = 88.2, Target = 88.9CPI = 88.2, Target = 88.9 80.9 91.5 88.2 -3.3 88.9 90.5 743475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.7, Target = 96CPI = 96.7, Target = 96 93.1 96.7 96.7 0.0 96.0 96.6 7112375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.1, Target = 94.2CPI = 92.1, Target = 94.2CPI = 92.1, Target = 94.2 90.0 90.2 92.1 1.9 94.2 95.0 5012650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.9, Target = 89.2CPI = 76.9, Target = 89.2CPI = 76.9, Target = 89.2 81.5 84.0 76.9 -7.1 89.2 90.8 24270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.6, Target = 94.3CPI = 94.6, Target = 94.3 90.2 91.2 94.6 3.4 94.3 95.1 5811275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 43.2 44.01410 0.7 0.014125
High needs 22.6 23.5340 1.9 0.03425
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 45.3 47.21230 0.7 0.012325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 66.0 71.61410 2.7 2.114125
High needs 52.8 44.1340 7.5 5.93425
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 67.4 75.612325 1.5 0.812325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.9 31.712625 1.4 1.61260
High needs 11.3 11.1270 3.8 7.4270
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.7 33.011225 0.8 0.011225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 33.0 36.0 3.0 51.0Yes12375On Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 33.0 37.0 4.0 51.0No2550Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 33.0 37.0 4.0 51.0Yes10975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 63.5 69.0 5.5 51.0No123100Above Target
High needsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 63.0 69.0 6.0 51.0No25100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 62.0 68.0 6.0 51.0No109100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 80 85.9 95.2 9.3 80.0 90.0167100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 87.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.7, Target = 80 77.8 87.7 9.9 80.0 90.05775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.024--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80 87.7 95.7 8.0 80.0 90.0164100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 88.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.7, Target = 85 92.0 88.7 -3.3 85.0 95.014275On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 81.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.9, Target = 85 85.7 81.9 -3.8 85.0 95.0720Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.016--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.06--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 90.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.8, Target = 85 92.6 90.8 -1.8 85.0 95.013075On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.2, Target = 1.7 2.9 2.8 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.54664875On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 2.9, Target = 3.3 5.6 4.8 2.9 1.9 3.3 2.83617175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------117--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------81--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.2, Target = 1.8 3.0 2.3 1.2 1.1 1.8 1.53659875On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students10
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students142142100Yes142142100Yes142142100Yes
High needs3535100Yes3535100Yes3535100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged25---25---25---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities15---15---15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---3---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino12---12---12---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White124124100Yes124124100Yes124124100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles