Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Edith C Baker

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Edith C Baker

Organization Information
District:	Brookline (00460000)	School type:	Elementary-Middle School
School:	Edith C Baker (00460005)	Grades served:	K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:	Greater Boston	Title I status:	Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:			Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.6	93.8	94.1	0.3	96.3	96.8	89	495	75	On Target
High needs		84.5	82.8	83.4	0.6	91.0	92.3	80	146	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.1	83.1	74.3	-8.8	84.5	91.6	39	36	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		91.9	81.7	79.3	-2.4	95.3	96.0	82	52	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		78.5	77.8	81.3	3.5	87.5	89.3	93	83	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		96.6	96.8	94.1	-2.7	98.0	98.3	71	119	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		90.5	82.9	89.3	6.4	94.5	95.3	87	49	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		94.6	93.4	99.4	6.0	96.9	97.3	89	41	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		94.4	95.0	94.1	-0.9	96.7	97.2	79	260	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.0	90.3	90.8	0.5	96.5	97.0	87	493	75	On Target
High needs		86.8	75.2	75.5	0.3	92.3	93.4	76	146	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.1	73.1	64.6	-8.5	75.3	86.6	36	36	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		94.0	87.5	76.9	-10.6	96.5	97.0	83	52	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		80.6	66.8	71.1	4.3	88.7	90.3	88	83	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		97.2	96.1	94.1	-2.0	98.4	98.6	74	118	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		87.9	73.7	80.6	6.9	92.9	94.0	86	49	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		96.7	92.3	93.8	1.5	98.1	98.4	57	40	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		94.5	91.2	91.7	0.5	96.8	97.3	77	260	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.5	85.4	89.3	3.9	91.5	92.8	92	143	100	Above Target
High needs		67.4	67.2	73.5	6.3	81.0	83.7	87	34	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.8	61.8	66.7	4.9	73.6	77.4	84	21	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		92.8	95.5	95.1	-0.4	95.8	96.4	78	36	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.2	85.8	89.4	3.6	92.0	93.1	83	73	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	32.7	31.3	495	0	2.9	3.8	495	0
High needs	11.2	10.3	146	0	9.7	12.3	146	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.0	13.9	36	25	12.5	22.2	36	0
EL and Former EL	24.4	13.5	52	0	9.8	19.2	52	0
Students w/ disabilities	3.8	6.0	83	25	13.9	12.0	83	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	48.6	39.5	119	0	1.8	5.0	119	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Hispanic/Latino	23.7	18.4	49	0	10.5	6.1	49	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	34.2	41.5	41	25	2.6	0.0	41	25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	29.8	30.8	260	0	2.0	3.5	260	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	48.6	52.7	493	0	4.6	5.5	493	0
High needs	21.1	25.3	146	25	14.3	17.8	146	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.0	16.7	36	0	25.0	33.3	36	0
EL and Former EL	45.0	40.4	52	0	5.0	21.2	52	0
Students w/ disabilities	7.6	15.7	83	25	20.3	20.5	83	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	75.2	71.2	118	0	0.0	5.1	118	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Hispanic/Latino	21.1	28.6	49	25	23.7	12.2	49	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	46.2	60.0	40	25	2.6	2.5	40	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	43.9	51.2	260	25	3.7	4.6	260	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.8	30.8	143	25	5.9	2.8	143	25
High needs	4.2	14.7	34	25	16.7	8.8	34	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.8	14.3	21	25	22.2	9.5	21	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	32.1	41.7	36	25	0.0	2.8	36	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.8	30.1	73	25	4.3	0.0	73	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.0	69.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	356	100	Above Target
High needs		61.5	71.0	9.5	51.0	Yes	90	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		53.0	71.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	60	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		70.5	72.0	1.5	51.0	No	81	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.0	63.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	34	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		74.0	70.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	36	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		67.0	67.0	0.0	51.0	No	182	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.0	64.0	5.0	51.0	No	357	100	Above Target
High needs		51.0	64.5	13.5	51.0	No	90	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		49.0	60.5	11.5	51.0	Yes	60	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		73.5	70.5	-3.0	51.0	No	80	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		65.0	56.0	-9.0	51.0	No	34	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		65.0	64.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	36	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		50.0	65.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	184	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	79.0	60.0	41	25
High needs	79.0	60.0	41	25
EL and Former EL	79.0	60.0	41	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	524	523	100	Yes	524	522	100	Yes	155	155	100	Yes
High needs	174	173	99	Yes	174	173	99	Yes	46	46	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	39	39	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	80	79	99	Yes	80	79	99	Yes	21	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	83	83	100	Yes	83	83	100	Yes	21	21	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	132	132	100	Yes	132	132	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	24	-	-	-	24	-	-	-	12	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	49	49	100	Yes	49	49	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	46	46	100	Yes	46	45	98	Yes	16	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	271	270	100	Yes	271	270	100	Yes	76	76	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Edith C Baker

Edith C Baker (00460005)

2016 Accountability Data - Edith C Baker

School and District Profiles