Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sumner Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - Charles Sumner

Organization Information

District:

Boston (00350000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Charles Sumner (00350052)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.0	72.8	72.6	-0.2	86.6	88.5	12	207	25	No Change
High needs		76.1	70.3	70.7	0.4	86.1	88.1	27	175	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.2	73.2	72.2	-1.0	75.4	86.6	28	136	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		75.9	69.5	69.5	0.0	85.9	88.0	45	82	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		65.9	56.8	59.1	2.3	80.1	83.0	33	66	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		75.5	72.2	69.3	-2.9	85.7	87.8	33	48	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		77.6	72.3	73.2	0.9	86.9	88.8	54	142	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.1	70.1	66.8	-3.3	86.6	88.6	5	207	0	Declined
High needs		76.7	69.1	64.4	-4.7	86.4	88.4	12	175	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.9	70.9	67.5	-3.4	73.3	85.5	17	136	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		77.6	71.3	66.2	-5.1	86.9	88.8	28	82	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		70.9	55.6	43.6	-12.0	83.0	85.5	7	66	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		75.0	63.3	59.9	-3.4	85.4	87.5	10	48	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		78.5	71.3	68.7	-2.6	87.5	89.3	34	142	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.9	50.5	43.5	-7.0	78.9	82.0	2	50	0	Declined
High needs		62.7	50.0	42.9	-7.1	78.2	81.4	4	46	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	50.0	47.1	-2.9	54.2	75.0	12	34	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		62.5	52.1	35.2	-16.9	78.1	81.3	6	22	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		64.9	53.9	45.7	-8.2	79.5	82.5	18	35	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.4	4.8	207	25	9.2	11.6	207	0
High needs	0.6	2.3	175	25	10.6	12.6	175	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.7	2.9	136	25	7.9	13.2	136	0
EL and Former EL	1.0	0.0	82	0	10.0	13.4	82	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	66	0	20.8	21.2	66	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	0.0	48	0	6.7	12.5	48	0
Hispanic/Latino	1.4	6.3	142	25	10.8	11.3	142	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.2	12.6	207	25	16.0	23.2	207	0
High needs	8.4	8.0	175	0	16.9	25.7	175	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.6	9.6	136	25	15.1	21.3	136	0
EL and Former EL	5.0	2.4	82	0	12.0	20.7	82	0
Students w/ disabilities	7.9	4.5	66	0	32.9	50.0	66	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4.4	16.7	48	25	26.7	37.5	48	0
Hispanic/Latino	10.8	10.6	142	0	14.2	18.3	142	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	0.0	50	0	29.1	50.0	50	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	46	0	29.4	52.2	46	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	34	0	31.0	44.1	34	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	22	0	22.9	63.6	22	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	35	0	21.1	45.7	35	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		40.0	48.5	8.5	51.0	No	118	50	Below Target
High needs		40.0	40.0	0.0	51.0	No	101	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	40.0	-2.0	51.0	No	77	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		43.5	39.5	-4.0	51.0	No	50	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		29.0	43.0	14.0	51.0	No	42	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		43.0	40.0	-3.0	51.0	No	25	25	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		35.5	52.0	16.5	51.0	No	88	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	34.0	-8.0	51.0	No	118	25	Below Target
High needs		40.0	33.0	-7.0	51.0	No	101	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	34.0	-8.0	51.0	No	77	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		42.5	36.5	-6.0	51.0	No	50	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		30.0	33.0	3.0	51.0	No	42	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		43.0	54.0	11.0	51.0	No	25	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		38.5	32.5	-6.0	51.0	No	88	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	42.0	60.0	116.00	0
High needs	42.0	60.0	116.00	0
EL and Former EL	42.0	60.0	116.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	220	216	98	Yes	220	216	98	Yes	57	56	98	Yes
High needs	187	184	98	Yes	187	184	98	Yes	53	52	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	148	145	98	Yes	148	145	98	Yes	41	40	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	84	83	99	Yes	84	83	99	Yes	22	22	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	71	70	99	Yes	71	70	99	Yes	21	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	55	53	96	Yes	55	53	96	Yes	18	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	147	145	99	Yes	147	145	99	Yes	38	38	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.