Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Centerville Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Centerville Elementary
Organization Information
District:Beverly (00300000)School type:Elementary School
School:Centerville Elementary (00300010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.3, Target = 92.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 92.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 92.1 86.5 77.2 81.3 4.1 92.1 93.3 3017050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 68.9, Target = 84CPI = 68.9, Target = 84CPI = 68.9, Target = 84 72.6 62.5 68.9 6.4 84.0 86.3 218250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.7, Target = 69.9CPI = 71.7, Target = 69.9CPI = 71.7, Target = 69.9 67.2 67.2 71.7 4.5 69.9 83.6 2769100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 55.9, Target = 75.3CPI = 55.9, Target = 75.3CPI = 55.9, Target = 75.3 57.6 54.2 55.9 1.7 75.3 78.8 273850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.8, Target = 92.5CPI = 82.8, Target = 92.5CPI = 82.8, Target = 92.5 87.1 79.1 82.8 3.7 92.5 93.6 2213450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.1, Target = 86.2CPI = 77.1, Target = 86.2CPI = 77.1, Target = 86.2 76.4 74.1 77.1 3.0 86.2 88.2 2017050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 58.8, Target = 75.6CPI = 58.8, Target = 75.6CPI = 58.8, Target = 75.6 58.1 60.6 58.8 -1.8 75.6 79.1 48225No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 62.3, Target = 69CPI = 62.3, Target = 69CPI = 62.3, Target = 69 66.2 66.2 62.3 -3.9 69.0 83.1 7690Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 40.1, Target = 65.5CPI = 40.1, Target = 65.5CPI = 40.1, Target = 65.5 40.9 47.3 40.1 -7.2 65.5 70.5 4380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79.9, Target = 87.2CPI = 79.9, Target = 87.2CPI = 79.9, Target = 87.2 78.1 75.6 79.9 4.3 87.2 89.1 1513450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 67.3, Target = 87.1CPI = 67.3, Target = 87.1CPI = 67.3, Target = 87.1 77.9 68.6 67.3 -1.3 87.1 89.0 197125No Change
High needs  63.0---- 81.5-29--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 68.9, Target = 87.8CPI = 68.9, Target = 87.8CPI = 68.9, Target = 87.8 79.1 69.4 68.9 -0.5 87.8 89.6 86125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.0 10.617025 12.0 9.417025
High needs 1.4 1.2820 22.2 17.18225
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 1.4690 17.6 15.9690
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0380 30.6 23.73825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--22---22-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.9 11.913425 9.8 9.71340
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.5 23.517025 14.6 14.71700
High needs 11.0 4.9820 27.4 29.3820
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.7 5.8690 21.6 26.1690
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 2.7 0.0380 45.9 50.0380
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--22---22-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.7 26.913425 13.0 11.91340
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.9 9.97125 15.7 16.9710
High needs--29---29-
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.0 11.56125 15.0 14.8610
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 39.0 54.0 15.0 51.0Yes111100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 29.5 60.0 30.5 51.0Yes57100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 36.0 62.0 26.0 51.0Yes48100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 39.0 50.5 11.5 51.0Yes8675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 43.0 54.0 11.0 51.0Yes11175On Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 39.0 38.0 -1.0 51.0No5725Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 39.0 38.0 -1.0 51.0No4825Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 44.0 55.5 11.5 51.0Yes8675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18417595Yes18417595Yes7373100Yes
High needs938796Yes938796Yes3131100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged757397Yes757397Yes24---
EL and Former EL2---2---1---
Students w/ disabilities444094No444094No17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black8---8---1---
Hispanic/Latino25---25---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White14313595Yes14313595Yes6262100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles