Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Whitman Hanson Regional

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Whitman Hanson Regional

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Whitman-Hanson (07800000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
62% - Substantial progress toward targets52

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage64%61%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
62%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage64%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage52%47%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
49%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage47% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage52%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
41

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 98.2 0.4 99.2 2844Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.5 97.0 4.5 94.5 664Exceeded Target
High needs 91.4 94.2 2.8 93.3 773Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.2 92.8 -1.4 96.4 451No Change
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 85.1 91.3 6.2 87.0 494Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 98.4 0.3 99.6 2574Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.0 93.1 2.1 92.7 2813Met Target
Lowest Performing 69.5 74.6 5.1 72.2 664Exceeded Target
High needs 80.6 82.3 1.7 82.9 753Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 84.7 82.6 -2.1 87.5 431No Change
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 68.9 77.7 8.8 71.5 474Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.4 93.9 2.5 93.1 2543Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.3 92.5 -2.8 97.0 2680Declined
Lowest Performing 83.2 76.9 -6.3 86.7 660Declined
High needs 88.5 83.0 -5.5 91.1 720Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.9 85.7 -6.2 94.7 420Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 81.3 77.2 -4.1 84.0 450Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.3 93.6 -1.7 97.2 2471No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 60.2 2674Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing 39.3 641Low Growth
High needs 50.4 683Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.5 403Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 46.1 422Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black- 6--
Hispanic/Latino- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 60.5 2474Exceeded Typical Growth

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 44.8 2642Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 30.5 641Low Growth
High needs 37.0 661Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.8 381Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 35.1 401Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black- 6--
Hispanic/Latino- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 44.7 2442Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.9 95.1 -1.8 98.7 3063Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.7 87.8 -4.9 96.1 980Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.3 87.7 -5.6 97.8 810Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 87.8 87.8 0.0 93.5 411No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.4 95.8 -1.6 99.2 2833Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 99.3 2.2 98.8 2903Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.9 99.1 6.2 96.8 1104Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 96.1 98.9 2.8 100.0 903Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 86.7 97.6 10.9 91.8 414Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.9 99.3 2.4 98.7 2734Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.4 0.9 0.5 1.0 1,1643Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.4 1.6 0.2 1.3 3090Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.8 2041No Change
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 0.7 1.3 0.6 1.0 1540Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 26--
Hispanic/Latino---- 33--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 28--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 0.5 0.9 0.4 1.0 1,0563Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 18.5 18.0 -0.5 17.2 1,1812Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 17.2 24.2 7.0 12.4 660Declined
High needs 33.1 34.4 1.3 30.8 3460Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.6 41.9 3.3 34.0 2100Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 32.1 32.7 0.6 28.5 1560Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 33--
Hispanic/Latino---- 41--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 30--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 18.0 16.8 -1.2 16.6 1,0543Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.8 69.6 4.8 69.2 5833Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 34.5 45.2 10.7 41.6 1774Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.2 53.8 15.6 45.9 1324Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 16.2 14.3 -1.9 23.6 700Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 66.1 70.7 4.6 71.1 5153Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles