This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our district and its schools including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
648
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
10.4 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
0.0
0.9
All Schools
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
-
0.0
Enrollment and Educator Data (Continued)
Educator Quality Data for High Poverty and Low Poverty Lincoln Public Schools
School
Highly Qualified %
Not Highly Qualified %
Licensed %
Low Poverty
Hanscom Middle
100.0
0.0
100.0
Hanscom Primary
100.0
0.0
100.0
Lincoln School
100.0
0.0
100.0
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
One or more schools in the district classified into Level 2
This district’s determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This district’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
66
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
60
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
35
Did Not Meet Target
Students w/ disabilities
59
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
99
Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black
71
Did Not Meet Target
Hispanic/Latino
56
Did Not Meet Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
73
Did Not Meet Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
71
Did Not Meet Target
School Accountability Information
School
School Type
Title I Status
Accountability and Assistance Level
Hanscom Primary
Elementary School
Title I School (TA)
Level 2
Lincoln School
Elementary-Middle School
Non-Title I School (NT)
Level 1
Hanscom Middle
Elementary-Middle School
Title I School (TA)
Level 2
Lincoln: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.6
91.2
91.7
0.5
95.1
95.8
65
706
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
80.4
77.7
79.1
1.4
88.6
90.2
53
171
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
90.0
90.0
85.7
-4.3
90.8
95.0
76
35
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
86.7
85.8
81.7
-4.1
92.2
93.4
75
26
0
Declined
Students w/ disabilities
71.6
74.7
76.5
1.8
83.4
85.8
75
136
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
95.2
99.3
98.3
-1.0
97.2
97.6
94
29
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
85.1
86.0
84.5
-1.5
91.3
92.6
59
74
25
No Change
Hispanic/Latino
84.4
85.4
86.6
1.2
90.9
92.2
74
97
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
89.2
91.7
93.1
1.4
93.7
94.6
69
65
75
On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
White
93.5
92.8
93.4
0.6
96.2
96.8
71
438
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
84.7
85.0
86.2
1.2
91.1
92.4
63
710
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
70.5
71.5
70.9
-0.6
82.8
85.3
57
170
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
76.4
76.4
75.0
-1.4
78.4
88.2
57
34
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
81.3
79.0
75.0
-4.0
89.1
90.7
68
25
0
Declined
Students w/ disabilities
65.7
68.5
67.7
-0.8
80.0
82.9
80
137
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
92.3
95.0
93.1
-1.9
95.5
96.2
51
29
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
69.7
72.8
79.4
6.6
82.3
84.9
85
74
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
71.0
76.9
76.0
-0.9
83.1
85.5
63
97
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
84.5
87.0
86.9
-0.1
91.0
92.3
64
65
25
No Change
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
White
88.4
87.8
89.1
1.3
93.2
94.2
70
441
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
83.7
85.7
85.9
0.2
90.5
91.9
68
224
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
69.1
69.1
71.0
1.9
82.0
84.6
60
44
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
64.1
70.7
72.3
1.6
79.1
82.1
88
37
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
62.5
71.2
83.3
12.1
78.1
81.3
97
24
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
78.8
-
75.9
-0.5
87.6
89.4
68
27
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
87.7
88.3
89.3
1.0
92.8
93.9
81
143
75
On Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
24.1
22.8
706
0
4.1
3.4
706
25
High needs
5.6
4.1
171
0
14.5
11.1
171
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
11.4
5.7
35
0
5.7
5.7
35
0
EL and Former EL
3.3
0.0
26
0
3.3
7.7
26
0
Students w/ disabilities
3.5
3.7
136
0
17.5
12.5
136
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
44.1
44.8
29
0
0.0
0.0
29
25
Afr. Amer./Black
9.6
10.8
74
25
5.5
8.1
74
0
Hispanic/Latino
10.6
10.3
97
0
4.3
5.2
97
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
27.5
27.7
65
0
3.9
3.1
65
25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
White
27.8
25.3
438
0
4.1
2.5
438
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
33.9
32.3
710
0
6.6
7.2
710
0
High needs
14.4
13.5
170
0
17.1
20.6
170
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
13.9
23.5
34
25
11.1
14.7
34
0
EL and Former EL
19.4
12.0
25
0
9.7
16.0
25
0
Students w/ disabilities
11.2
8.8
137
0
19.6
23.4
137
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
57.1
41.4
29
0
2.9
3.4
29
0
Afr. Amer./Black
7.2
16.2
74
25
15.9
12.2
74
25
Hispanic/Latino
21.3
14.4
97
0
9.6
10.3
97
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
46.0
38.5
65
0
8.0
9.2
65
0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
White
37.8
37.2
441
0
4.3
5.7
441
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
12.8
19.2
224
25
4.6
3.6
224
25
High needs
2.1
2.3
44
0
10.6
18.2
44
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.9
2.7
37
0
8.6
13.5
37
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Afr. Amer./Black
0.0
8.3
24
25
7.7
4.2
24
25
Hispanic/Latino
13.5
3.7
27
0
16.2
7.4
27
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
White
16.3
23.1
143
25
4.3
1.4
143
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
55.0
62.0
7.0
51.0
No
465
100
Above Target
High needs
55.5
54.0
-1.5
51.0
No
116
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
21
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
20
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
52.5
55.0
2.5
51.0
No
94
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
63.0
65.0
2.0
51.0
No
23
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
58.0
62.5
4.5
51.0
Yes
50
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
45.5
55.5
10.0
51.0
Yes
62
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
52.5
70.0
17.5
51.0
No
39
100
Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
White
57.0
62.5
5.5
51.0
No
288
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
47.0
52.0
5.0
51.0
No
465
75
On Target
High needs
46.0
53.0
7.0
51.0
No
117
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
23
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
19
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
43.0
55.0
12.0
51.0
No
95
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
60.0
37.0
-23.0
51.0
No
23
25
Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black
31.0
58.5
27.5
51.0
Yes
50
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
46.0
52.0
6.0
51.0
No
64
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
36.0
45.0
9.0
51.0
No
39
50
Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
White
51.0
52.5
1.5
51.0
No
286
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
15
-
High needs
-
60.0
15
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
15
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
710
709
100
Yes
714
713
100
Yes
225
224
100
Yes
High needs
174
174
100
Yes
174
173
99
Yes
45
44
98
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
36
36
100
Yes
36
35
97
Yes
6
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
29
29
100
Yes
28
28
100
Yes
7
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
136
136
100
Yes
137
137
100
Yes
37
37
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
29
29
100
Yes
29
29
100
Yes
8
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
75
75
100
Yes
75
75
100
Yes
24
24
100
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
99
98
99
Yes
98
98
100
Yes
27
27
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
66
66
100
Yes
66
66
100
Yes
19
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
White
438
438
100
Yes
442
441
100
Yes
144
143
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
