Michael Wood, Superintendent Mailing Address: 34 School Street Hatfield, MA 01038
Phone: (413) 247-5641 FAX: (413) 247-0201 Website: http://www.hatfieldps.net
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our district and its schools including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
207
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
93.7
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
6.3
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
10.8 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
2.2
0.9
All Schools
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
93.7
-
93.7
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
6.3
-
6.3
Enrollment and Educator Data (Continued)
Educator Quality Data for High Poverty and Low Poverty Hatfield Public Schools
School
Highly Qualified %
Not Highly Qualified %
Licensed %
Low Poverty
Hatfield Elementary
85.2
14.8
100.0
Smith Academy
100.0
0.0
100.0
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
District
State
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
22
100
9
27
59
5
75.0
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
11
100
0
64
36
0
88.6
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
29
100
7
38
52
3
79.3
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
84
100
13
51
36
0
88.7
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
50
100
16
48
36
0
88.5
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
46
100
11
48
39
2
83.7
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
96
100
14
48
38
1
86.2
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
105
100
16
48
31
5
85.7
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
90
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
39
95
3
56
21
13
8
88.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
21
95
0
43
33
14
10
83.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
19
95
5
68
11
11
5
93.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
33
97
3
64
27
6
0
93.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
37
95
3
57
22
14
5
89.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
40
95
3
55
23
13
8
88.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
90
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
38
93
8
61
21
11
0
92.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
21
95
5
57
24
14
0
90.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
18
90
11
61
22
6
0
95.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
32
94
9
69
22
0
0
98.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
36
92
6
64
22
8
0
93.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
39
93
8
59
23
10
0
92.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
25
89
28
52
20
0
0
94.0
61.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
13
87
15
54
31
0
0
90.4
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
12
92
42
50
8
0
0
97.9
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
20
87
35
50
15
0
0
95.0
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
22
88
27
55
18
0
0
95.5
61.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
25
89
28
52
20
0
0
94.0
61.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
25
89
4
56
24
12
4
82.0
45.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
13
87
8
54
15
15
8
78.8
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
12
92
0
58
33
8
0
85.4
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
20
87
5
60
25
5
5
85.0
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
22
88
5
59
18
14
5
81.8
43.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
25
89
4
56
24
12
4
82.0
45.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
26
96
0
54
38
8
0
89.4
33.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
15
94
0
53
33
13
0
86.7
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
15
100
0
47
47
7
0
90.0
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
9
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
24
100
0
63
33
4
0
92.7
38.0
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
29
97
0
52
38
10
0
88.8
36.0
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
30
97
0
50
40
10
0
88.3
33.0
29
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
26
96
4
15
50
23
8
75.0
39.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
15
94
7
20
33
33
7
70.0
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
15
100
0
7
67
13
13
76.7
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
9
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
24
100
4
17
58
17
4
82.3
43.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
29
97
3
14
52
21
10
74.1
38.0
29
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
30
97
3
13
50
23
10
73.3
38.0
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
39
100
5
62
23
8
3
91.0
49.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
17
100
0
47
29
12
12
77.9
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
25
100
8
72
16
4
0
98.0
55.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
35
100
6
69
26
0
0
97.1
49.0
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
39
100
5
62
21
8
5
89.1
49.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
42
100
5
62
21
7
5
89.9
46.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
38
97
3
53
32
5
8
84.2
43.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
16
94
6
38
25
13
19
73.4
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
25
100
4
56
36
0
4
90.0
44.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
34
97
6
56
35
3
0
92.6
45.0
34
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
38
97
3
47
34
5
11
82.2
43.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
41
98
5
49
32
5
10
83.5
43.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 7 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
10
100
20
20
40
10
10
80.0
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
6
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
34
100
6
56
29
6
3
90.4
34.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
25
100
4
64
24
8
0
91.0
37.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
10
100
10
30
50
0
10
87.5
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
29
100
7
62
24
3
3
92.2
34.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
29
100
0
59
38
3
0
92.2
33.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
35
100
6
54
31
6
3
90.0
34.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 7 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
10
100
10
20
10
40
20
45.0
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
6
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
34
100
6
41
18
29
6
67.6
32.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
25
100
8
44
20
20
8
73.0
32.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
10
100
0
30
20
50
0
57.5
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
29
100
7
45
24
24
0
76.7
35.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
29
100
3
41
21
28
7
69.0
30.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
35
100
6
40
20
29
6
68.6
31.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 8 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
31
100
6
55
26
6
6
87.1
42.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
19
100
5
53
26
11
5
85.5
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
16
100
6
56
25
6
6
85.9
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
31
100
6
61
26
6
0
92.7
45.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
31
100
3
52
29
10
6
83.9
50.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
35
100
6
54
26
9
6
85.7
43.0
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 8 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
31
100
3
68
23
6
0
96.8
26.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
19
100
0
58
32
11
0
94.7
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
16
100
13
69
6
6
6
92.2
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
31
100
6
68
19
6
0
96.8
31.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
31
100
6
58
23
10
3
92.7
23.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
35
100
6
63
20
9
3
93.6
23.0
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
51
96
6
31
29
20
14
75.5
22.0
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
20
100
15
50
20
5
10
85.0
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
35
95
0
23
31
29
17
69.3
18.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
194
97
7
58
25
7
3
91.5
38.0
149
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
110
96
3
54
30
10
4
87.5
32.0
87
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
97
98
11
60
21
5
3
93.8
46.0
74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
30
97
0
33
60
3
3
87.5
46.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
172
98
8
63
24
3
1
94.8
38.0
134
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
187
97
6
57
26
8
3
91.0
36.0
145
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
207
97
7
57
26
8
3
90.5
37.0
161
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
51
96
8
22
20
31
20
58.8
26.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
20
100
20
40
20
20
0
82.5
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
35
95
0
14
17
40
29
46.4
25.0
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
192
96
5
48
28
14
5
81.9
40.0
150
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
109
96
6
45
24
17
7
78.9
37.0
87
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
96
97
4
47
34
10
4
84.4
43.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
28
90
4
25
50
14
7
72.3
52.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
170
97
6
52
31
9
1
88.7
43.0
134
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
185
96
4
46
30
14
6
81.4
39.0
146
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
205
96
5
46
29
14
6
81.5
40.0
162
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Hatfield
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
One or more schools in the district classified into Level 2
This district’s determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This district’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
70
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
70
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
51
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
74
Did Not Meet Target
School Accountability Information
School
School Type
Title I Status
Accountability and Assistance Level
Hatfield Elementary
Elementary School
Title I School (TA)
Level 2
Smith Academy
Middle-High School or K-12
Non-Title I School (NT)
Level 1
Hatfield: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.2
93.4
91.6
-1.8
94.9
95.6
64
239
25
No Change
High needs
75.4
87.3
80.4
-6.9
85.7
87.7
63
65
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
93.8
93.8
88.0
-5.8
94.3
96.9
87
27
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
68.1
81.4
76.6
-4.8
81.4
84.1
75
47
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91.4
93.7
92.5
-1.2
95.0
95.7
67
222
25
No Change
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
81.1
82.5
83.3
0.8
89.0
90.6
46
236
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
57.5
68.1
64.8
-3.3
75.2
78.8
21
64
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
79.5
79.5
81.7
2.2
81.2
89.8
86
26
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
46.8
58.0
56.0
-2.0
69.0
73.4
42
46
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
81.5
82.9
83.4
0.5
89.2
90.8
40
219
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
82.6
85.7
86.2
0.5
89.9
91.3
69
96
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
62.9
73.5
79.3
5.8
78.4
81.5
93
29
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
56.3
-
-
-
-
78.2
-
22
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
83.5
85.5
88.7
3.2
90.4
91.8
76
84
75
On Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
17.8
13.0
239
0
1.3
2.9
239
0
High needs
22.4
4.6
65
0
4.5
10.8
65
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
40.6
11.1
27
0
0.0
7.4
27
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
7.0
0.0
47
0
7.0
12.8
47
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
17.1
13.5
222
0
0.9
2.3
222
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
23.9
27.5
236
25
8.4
12.3
236
0
High needs
18.8
17.2
64
0
23.2
31.3
64
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
36.4
34.6
26
0
9.1
11.5
26
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
4.5
8.7
46
25
36.4
41.3
46
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
23.3
27.9
219
25
7.3
11.9
219
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
16.2
13.5
96
0
4.8
1.0
96
25
High needs
14.7
6.9
29
0
14.7
3.4
29
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
13.7
13.1
84
0
5.3
0.0
84
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
48.0
38.0
-10.0
51.0
No
192
25
Below Target
High needs
51.0
34.0
-17.0
51.0
No
54
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
23
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
42.0
35.0
-7.0
51.0
No
39
25
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
48.0
38.0
-10.0
51.0
No
176
25
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
44.0
42.5
-1.5
51.0
Yes
192
75
On Target
High needs
38.5
31.5
-7.0
51.0
No
54
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
22
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
35.0
26.0
-9.0
51.0
No
39
0
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
45.0
43.0
-2.0
51.0
Yes
176
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
-
-
High needs
-
60.0
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
-
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
96.8
97.6
0.8
80.0
90.0
41
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
16
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
10
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
96.3
100.0
3.7
80.0
90.0
39
100
Above Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.4
96.8
2.4
85.0
95.0
31
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
12
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
8
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
94.1
96.3
2.2
85.0
95.0
27
100
Above Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
4.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
2.3
97
130
100
Above Target
High needs
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.7
3.2
94
36
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
4.8
-
-
-
-
2.4
-
29
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
2.0
96
118
100
Above Target
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
246
239
97
Yes
245
236
96
Yes
97
97
100
Yes
High needs
68
65
96
Yes
67
64
96
Yes
29
29
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
27
27
100
Yes
26
26
100
Yes
11
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
50
47
96
Yes
49
46
97
Yes
22
22
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
229
222
97
Yes
228
219
96
Yes
85
85
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.