Lisha Marie Cabral, Superintendent Mailing Address: 48 Spooner Street North Easton, MA 02356-0359
Phone: (508) 205-5900 FAX: Website: http://eastonmaschools.org Organization Description: Easton
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our district and its schools including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
1,122
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
14.3 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
0.0
0.9
All Schools
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
-
0.0
Enrollment and Educator Data (Continued)
Educator Quality Data for High Poverty and Low Poverty Easton Public Schools
School
Highly Qualified %
Not Highly Qualified %
Licensed %
Low Poverty
Easton Middle School
100.0
0.0
100.0
Oliver Ames High
100.0
0.0
100.0
Parkview Elementary
100.0
0.0
100.0
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
District
State
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
384
98
3
35
43
19
72.1
47.0
317
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
46
100
4
43
46
7
79.3
62.0
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
252
99
10
52
31
8
84.5
48.0
191
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
568
99
6
45
36
13
78.8
48.5
456
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
96
100
14
50
26
10
83.1
49.0
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
60
100
32
50
15
3
93.8
63.5
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
79
100
25
48
27
0
90.2
63.0
61
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
53
100
23
49
23
6
89.2
45.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
1,751
99
21
59
16
4
92.5
50.0
1,455
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
1,013
100
16
58
21
5
89.6
50.0
835
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
1,030
99
27
58
12
2
94.2
51.0
854
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
18
100
0
22
61
17
63.9
N/A
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
73
100
22
42
32
4
86.3
69.0
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
2,043
99
22
58
17
4
91.9
51.0
1,689
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
2,066
99
23
56
17
5
91.2
50.0
1,706
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
District
State
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
387
98
7
22
41
30
62.7
59.0
320
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
46
100
24
22
37
17
74.5
65.0
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
253
99
24
33
30
13
79.5
58.0
191
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
571
99
16
27
36
21
71.1
59.0
457
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
95
99
22
32
26
20
75.5
57.0
79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
60
100
63
20
8
8
91.7
64.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
80
100
39
25
29
8
83.1
61.0
61
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
55
100
38
29
20
13
83.6
50.5
42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
1,757
99
45
33
17
5
90.5
61.0
1,460
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
1,014
100
43
32
17
7
88.7
61.0
837
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
1,037
99
45
32
18
5
90.1
59.0
857
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
18
100
22
17
33
28
68.1
N/A
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
73
100
42
22
23
12
82.9
63.0
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
2,051
99
44
32
18
6
89.4
61.0
1,694
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
2,069
99
36
37
19
8
87.5
51.0
1,710
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
District
State
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
165
99
2
22
53
22
65.5
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
113
97
12
40
39
9
80.3
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
242
98
7
32
46
15
72.8
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
39
98
15
28
41
15
73.7
N/A
N/A
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
23
100
43
39
17
0
93.5
N/A
N/A
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
31
97
23
48
23
6
88.7
N/A
N/A
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
21
100
19
43
29
10
86.9
N/A
N/A
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
769
99
24
48
25
4
88.8
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
444
100
25
48
23
5
89.0
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
442
99
23
45
28
4
87.4
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
28
100
21
46
32
0
89.3
N/A
N/A
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
886
99
24
47
25
5
88.2
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
913
100
15
48
32
5
86.3
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 Accountability Data - Easton
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
One or more schools in the district classified into Level 2
This district’s determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This district’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
70
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
60
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
68
Did Not Meet Target
Students w/ disabilities
52
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
93
Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black
67
Did Not Meet Target
Hispanic/Latino
76
Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
61
Did Not Meet Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
69
Did Not Meet Target
School Accountability Information
School
School Type
Title I Status
Accountability and Assistance Level
Richardson Olmsted School
Elementary School
Title I School (TA)
Level 2
Easton Middle School
Middle School
Title I School (TA)
Level 2
Oliver Ames High
High School
Non-Title I School (NT)
Level 2
Center School
Early Elementary School
Non-Title I School (NT)
Insufficient data
Parkview Elementary
Early Elementary School
Non-Title I School (NT)
Insufficient data
Moreau Hall
Early Elementary School
Non-Title I School (NT)
Insufficient data
Easton: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
92.2
91.2
92.0
0.8
95.5
96.1
68
2044
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
79.1
76.9
78.9
2.0
87.8
89.6
51
569
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
80.4
80.4
84.6
4.2
82.0
90.2
66
253
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
70.0
77.0
79.3
2.3
82.5
85.0
68
46
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
75.1
69.8
72.1
2.3
85.5
87.6
62
383
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Asian
92.9
93.5
93.8
0.3
95.9
96.5
46
60
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
83.9
82.7
83.1
0.4
90.6
92.0
52
96
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
86.5
87.0
90.2
3.2
92.1
93.3
85
79
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
90.4
89.4
89.2
-0.2
94.4
95.2
49
53
25
No Change
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
92.9
91.8
92.5
0.7
95.9
96.5
67
1752
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
88.1
87.5
89.4
1.9
93.1
94.1
76
2051
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
71.5
69.4
71.1
1.7
83.4
85.8
58
571
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
74.6
74.6
79.5
4.9
76.7
87.3
82
253
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
79.0
77.0
74.5
-2.5
87.8
89.5
66
46
25
No Change
Students w/ disabilities
66.4
60.3
62.6
2.3
80.4
83.2
68
386
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Asian
92.1
91.9
91.7
-0.2
95.4
96.1
40
60
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
78.3
73.8
75.5
1.7
87.3
89.2
68
95
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
79.9
81.0
83.1
2.1
88.3
90.0
87
80
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
86.0
81.8
83.6
1.8
91.8
93.0
54
55
50
Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
88.9
88.6
90.5
1.9
93.5
94.5
80
1757
75
On Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
85.5
86.3
88.2
1.9
91.5
92.8
78
886
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
70.1
70.6
72.8
2.2
82.6
85.1
73
242
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
77.2
77.2
80.3
3.1
79.1
88.6
86
113
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
65.7
65.1
65.5
0.4
80.0
82.9
69
165
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
81.5
89.3
93.5
4.2
89.2
90.8
71
23
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
71.6
79.1
73.7
-5.4
83.4
85.8
82
39
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
72.1
79.5
88.7
9.2
83.7
86.1
97
31
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
90.2
78.9
86.9
8.0
94.3
95.1
62
21
50
Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
87.0
87.1
88.8
1.7
92.4
93.5
77
769
75
On Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
22.7
21.6
2044
0
3.9
2.9
2044
25
High needs
6.1
6.3
569
0
12.7
9.8
569
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
10.7
9.9
253
0
11.8
5.9
253
25
EL and Former EL
8.0
4.3
46
0
12.0
6.5
46
25
Students w/ disabilities
1.0
2.9
383
25
17.9
14.1
383
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Asian
38.5
31.7
60
0
6.2
1.7
60
25
Afr. Amer./Black
13.9
13.5
96
0
12.9
9.4
96
25
Hispanic/Latino
14.1
25.3
79
25
9.9
0.0
79
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
23.1
22.6
53
0
3.8
3.8
53
0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
22.9
21.5
1752
0
3.1
2.7
1752
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
36.2
44.2
2051
25
7.2
5.5
2051
25
High needs
13.7
15.6
571
25
22.4
19.1
571
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
19.8
23.7
253
25
17.1
11.9
253
25
EL and Former EL
23.5
23.9
46
0
15.7
17.4
46
0
Students w/ disabilities
6.2
6.7
386
0
32.0
26.9
386
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Asian
58.5
63.3
60
0
9.2
6.7
60
25
Afr. Amer./Black
18.8
22.1
95
25
22.8
18.9
95
25
Hispanic/Latino
32.4
38.8
80
25
11.3
7.5
80
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
29.1
38.2
55
25
10.9
10.9
55
0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
36.7
45.2
1757
25
6.0
4.4
1757
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
15.4
23.6
886
25
3.7
3.8
886
0
High needs
5.2
7.0
242
25
12.7
12.8
242
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
8.7
12.4
113
25
8.7
6.2
113
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.4
2.4
165
0
17.2
18.8
165
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
25.7
43.5
23
25
2.9
0.0
23
25
Afr. Amer./Black
9.3
15.4
39
25
11.6
12.8
39
0
Hispanic/Latino
12.1
22.6
31
25
6.1
6.5
31
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
12.5
19.0
21
25
9.4
4.8
21
25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
15.6
23.7
769
25
3.0
3.4
769
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
50.0
51.0
1.0
51.0
No
1689
75
On Target
High needs
43.0
48.5
5.5
51.0
No
456
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
43.0
48.0
5.0
51.0
No
191
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
55.0
62.0
7.0
51.0
No
30
100
Above Target
Students w/ disabilities
41.0
47.0
6.0
51.0
No
317
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Asian
57.0
63.5
6.5
51.0
No
48
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
50.0
49.0
-1.0
51.0
No
80
50
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
44.0
63.0
19.0
51.0
No
61
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
51.0
45.0
-6.0
51.0
No
41
50
Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
50.0
50.0
0.0
51.0
No
1455
50
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
51.0
61.0
10.0
51.0
Yes
1694
100
Above Target
High needs
46.0
59.0
13.0
51.0
No
457
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
44.0
58.0
14.0
51.0
Yes
191
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
64.0
65.0
1.0
51.0
No
30
100
Above Target
Students w/ disabilities
45.0
59.0
14.0
51.0
No
320
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Asian
48.0
64.0
16.0
51.0
No
48
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
47.5
57.0
9.5
51.0
No
79
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
49.0
61.0
12.0
51.0
No
61
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
47.0
50.5
3.5
51.0
Yes
42
75
On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
52.0
61.0
9.0
51.0
Yes
1460
100
Above Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
73.0
60.0
31
25
High needs
73.0
60.0
31
25
EL and Former EL
73.0
60.0
31
25
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.2
97.6
2.4
80.0
90.0
292
100
Above Target
High needs
86.0
91.3
5.3
80.0
90.0
80
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
83.1
95.0
11.9
80.0
90.0
40
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
17
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
10
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
White
95.8
98.3
2.5
80.0
90.0
242
100
Above Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.0
96.1
1.1
85.0
95.0
311
100
Above Target
High needs
86.1
88.2
2.1
85.0
95.0
93
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
88.0
86.4
-1.6
85.0
95.0
59
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
14
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
14
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
10
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
95.7
96.9
1.2
85.0
95.0
260
100
Above Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
0.8
0.3
0.4
-0.1
0.5
0.4
79
1176
75
On Target
High needs
0.9
1.2
1.4
-0.2
0.5
0.5
67
212
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
1.4
-
-
-
-
0.7
-
73
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
1.3
-1.3
0.0
0.0
72
153
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
68
38
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
3.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
1.6
81
62
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
3.1
2.0
2.2
-0.2
1.8
1.6
56
45
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75
35
100
Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
0.6
0.3
0.4
-0.1
0.4
0.3
74
993
75
On Target
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
2059
2044
99
Yes
2062
2051
99
Yes
909
902
99
Yes
High needs
578
569
98
Yes
579
571
99
Yes
255
250
98
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
255
253
99
Yes
256
253
99
Yes
118
115
97
Yes
EL and Former EL
46
46
100
Yes
46
46
100
Yes
11
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
391
383
98
Yes
392
386
98
Yes
172
170
99
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Asian
60
60
100
Yes
60
60
100
Yes
26
26
100
Yes
Afr. Amer./Black
96
96
100
Yes
96
95
99
Yes
41
40
98
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
79
79
100
Yes
80
80
100
Yes
35
34
97
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
53
53
100
Yes
55
55
100
Yes
22
22
100
Yes
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
White
1767
1752
99
Yes
1767
1757
99
Yes
782
777
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
