Essex North Shore Agricultural and Technical School (08170505)
Shannon B Donnelly, Principal Mailing Address: P.O. Box 346 Hathorne, MA 01937-0346
Phone: (978) 304-4700 FAX: Website: http://EssexNorthShore.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
73
100
12
55
27
5
85.3
N/A
N/A
73
100
12
55
27
5
85.3
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
71
100
28
58
14
0
95.1
N/A
N/A
71
100
28
58
14
0
95.1
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
132
100
21
57
19
3
90.7
N/A
N/A
132
100
21
57
19
3
90.7
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
41
100
39
54
7
0
98.2
N/A
N/A
41
100
39
54
7
0
98.2
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
279
100
33
54
11
1
94.8
N/A
N/A
279
100
33
54
11
1
94.8
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
143
100
35
53
10
2
94.6
N/A
N/A
143
100
35
53
10
2
94.6
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
194
100
34
54
11
1
95.7
N/A
N/A
194
100
34
54
11
1
95.7
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
15
100
13
67
20
0
95.0
N/A
N/A
15
100
13
67
20
0
95.0
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
337
100
34
54
11
1
95.3
N/A
N/A
337
100
34
54
11
1
95.3
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
335
99
24
58
16
2
93.2
N/A
N/A
335
99
24
58
16
2
93.2
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Essex Technical High School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements (MR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
77
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
92
Met Target
High needs
89
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
86
Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
90
Met Target
Essex North Shore Agricultural and Technical School: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
99.2
99.3
99.6
0.3
99.4
99.6
87
344
100
Above Target
High needs
98.0
98.8
99.1
0.3
98.5
99.0
91
136
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
98.2
99.4
99.7
0.3
98.5
99.1
93
73
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
96.6
97.9
98.3
0.4
97.5
98.3
87
75
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
99.0
99.3
100.0
0.7
99.3
99.5
98
42
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
99.3
99.3
99.6
0.3
99.5
99.7
81
285
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.2
88.6
94.4
5.8
95.7
97.1
62
344
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
88.3
78.2
89.5
11.3
91.2
94.2
78
136
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
84.6
86.5
94.9
8.4
87.2
92.3
90
73
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
80.4
68.2
83.7
15.5
85.3
90.2
74
75
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
90.0
88.9
94.6
5.7
92.5
95.0
97
42
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
95.4
88.4
94.4
6.0
96.6
97.7
50
285
50
Improved Below Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.5
93.2
95.3
2.1
95.1
96.8
70
337
75
On Target
High needs
86.9
87.0
90.7
3.7
90.2
93.5
80
132
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
90.2
91.7
95.1
3.4
91.8
95.1
94
71
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
78.0
81.3
85.3
4.0
83.5
89.0
76
73
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
91.0
92.1
98.2
6.1
93.3
95.5
98
41
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
94.3
93.4
94.8
1.4
95.7
97.2
56
279
75
On Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
54.5
66.6
344
25
0.0
0.0
344
25
High needs
40.0
46.3
136
25
0.0
0.0
136
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
52.6
63.0
73
25
0.0
0.0
73
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Students w/ disabilities
23.2
30.7
75
25
0.0
0.0
75
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
77.8
64.3
42
0
0.0
0.0
42
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
50.7
66.7
285
25
0.0
0.0
285
25
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
40.9
50.9
344
25
4.6
2.3
344
25
High needs
20.9
36.0
136
25
10.1
5.1
136
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
28.2
53.4
73
25
6.4
4.1
73
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Students w/ disabilities
11.1
17.3
75
25
16.0
8.0
75
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
41.7
64.3
42
25
8.3
2.4
42
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
40.9
48.1
285
25
4.1
2.1
285
25
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
24.2
34.4
337
25
2.4
1.2
337
25
High needs
11.7
21.2
132
25
4.4
3.0
132
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
16.0
28.2
71
25
2.7
0.0
71
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Students w/ disabilities
5.0
12.3
73
25
7.5
5.5
73
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
22.9
39.0
41
25
5.7
0.0
41
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
25.2
33.3
279
25
1.8
1.4
279
25
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
66.0
70.0
4.0
51.0
Yes
307
100
Above Target
High needs
62.0
63.0
1.0
51.0
Yes
125
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
63.0
69.0
6.0
51.0
Yes
68
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
66.0
59.0
-7.0
51.0
Yes
68
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
69.0
77.5
8.5
51.0
Yes
40
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
65.0
67.5
2.5
51.0
Yes
252
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
43.0
48.0
5.0
51.0
Yes
307
75
On Target
High needs
43.0
49.0
6.0
51.0
Yes
125
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
38.0
57.5
19.5
51.0
Yes
68
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
46.0
48.0
2.0
51.0
Yes
68
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
39.5
56.0
16.5
51.0
Yes
40
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
44.0
47.0
3.0
51.0
Yes
252
75
On Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
4
-
High needs
-
60.0
4
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
4
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.7
97.0
-1.7
80.0
90.0
237
100
Above Target
High needs
97.9
93.9
-4.0
80.0
90.0
99
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
96.7
91.5
-5.2
80.0
90.0
59
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
24
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
98.5
109.8
11.3
80.0
90.0
204
100
Above Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
99.1
98.3
-0.8
85.0
95.0
235
100
Above Target
High needs
99.0
96.9
-2.1
85.0
95.0
97
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
100.0
100.0
0.0
85.0
95.0
60
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
24
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
98.9
98.0
-0.9
85.0
95.0
198
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
0.2
0.1
0.3
-0.2
0.2
0.1
80
1219
75
On Target
High needs
0.3
0.0
0.6
-0.6
0.2
0.2
81
474
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
0.0
0.0
0.8
-0.8
0.0
0.0
74
254
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
0.7
-0.7
0.0
0.0
76
278
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
0.0
0.0
0.7
-0.7
0.0
0.0
68
143
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
0.2
0.1
0.3
-0.2
0.2
0.1
73
1011
75
On Target
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
344
344
100
Yes
344
344
100
Yes
344
344
100
Yes
High needs
136
136
100
Yes
136
136
100
Yes
136
136
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
73
73
100
Yes
73
73
100
Yes
73
73
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
75
75
100
Yes
75
75
100
Yes
75
75
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
42
42
100
Yes
42
42
100
Yes
42
42
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
285
285
100
Yes
285
285
100
Yes
285
285
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
Massachusetts 
