Karen Guenette, Principal Mailing Address: 207 Hart Street Taunton, MA 02780-3715
Phone: (508) 823-5151 FAX: (508) 822-2687 Website: http://www.bptech.org.
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
49
100
6
27
51
16
69.9
N/A
N/A
49
100
6
27
51
16
69.9
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
85
100
13
46
35
6
83.8
N/A
N/A
85
100
13
46
35
6
83.8
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
112
100
12
43
38
7
81.7
N/A
N/A
112
100
12
43
38
7
81.7
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
13
100
0
54
38
8
76.9
N/A
N/A
13
100
0
54
38
8
76.9
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
22
100
18
45
27
9
84.1
N/A
N/A
22
100
18
45
27
9
84.1
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
250
100
19
53
26
2
90.2
N/A
N/A
250
100
19
53
26
2
90.2
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
180
100
19
54
24
2
90.4
N/A
N/A
180
100
19
54
24
2
90.4
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
116
100
15
49
33
3
86.4
N/A
N/A
116
100
15
49
33
3
86.4
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
297
100
18
52
27
3
88.9
N/A
N/A
297
100
18
52
27
3
88.9
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
313
100
13
52
34
2
87.1
N/A
N/A
313
100
13
52
34
2
87.1
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Bristol-Plymouth Vocational Technical
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements (MR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
51
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
73
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
68
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
57
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
78
Met Target
Bristol-Plymouth Vocational Technical: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.7
98.0
97.6
-0.4
97.9
97.9
39
319
100
Above Target
High needs
92.4
96.3
94.6
-1.7
96.2
96.2
46
126
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
97.4
97.0
95.3
-1.7
97.8
98.7
47
95
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
84.9
94.1
88.8
-5.3
92.5
92.5
34
56
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
98.9
98.9
92.4
-6.5
99.0
99.5
51
23
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
95.6
97.7
98.3
0.6
97.8
97.8
39
267
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
92.1
90.5
91.0
0.5
96.1
96.1
40
319
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
87.5
84.0
84.8
0.8
93.8
93.8
60
125
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
88.8
87.6
85.6
-2.0
90.7
94.4
56
94
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
78.1
75.7
72.7
-3.0
89.1
89.1
46
55
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
80.7
80.7
84.8
4.1
82.3
90.4
69
23
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
92.8
92.2
92.5
0.3
96.4
96.4
33
267
50
Improved Below Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
84.8
87.1
88.9
1.8
92.4
92.4
34
297
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
77.1
80.9
81.7
0.8
88.6
88.6
39
112
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
81.6
81.9
83.8
1.9
84.7
90.8
42
85
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
66.0
73.5
69.9
-3.6
83.0
83.0
28
49
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
77.4
77.4
84.1
6.7
79.3
88.7
67
22
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
85.8
88.2
90.2
2.0
92.9
92.9
21
250
50
Improved Below Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
34.5
29.2
319
0
0.6
1.3
319
0
High needs
26.8
19.0
126
0
1.4
3.2
126
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
31.2
23.2
95
0
1.1
3.2
95
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
13.9
5.4
56
0
2.8
7.1
56
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Hispanic/Latino
31.8
13.0
23
0
0.0
4.3
23
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
34.8
30.0
267
0
0.7
0.7
267
0
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
45.0
45.8
319
0
4.7
3.8
319
25
High needs
33.1
28.0
125
0
9.2
8.0
125
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
37.6
34.0
94
0
5.4
9.6
94
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
20.8
10.9
55
0
16.7
18.2
55
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Hispanic/Latino
45.5
30.4
23
0
4.5
4.3
23
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
45.7
48.7
267
0
3.6
3.0
267
25
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
12.8
17.8
297
25
1.6
2.7
297
0
High needs
5.9
11.6
112
25
3.7
7.1
112
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
6.9
12.9
85
25
3.4
5.9
85
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.9
6.1
49
25
5.9
16.3
49
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Hispanic/Latino
0.0
18.2
22
25
4.8
9.1
22
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
13.8
19.2
250
25
1.5
2.0
250
0
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
44.0
44.0
0.0
51.0
No
291
50
Below Target
High needs
48.0
41.0
-7.0
51.0
No
117
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
48.5
40.0
-8.5
51.0
No
87
25
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
45.0
35.0
-10.0
51.0
No
51
25
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
66.0
28.0
-38.0
51.0
No
21
0
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
43.0
46.5
3.5
51.0
Yes
246
75
On Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
58.5
61.5
3.0
51.0
No
288
100
Above Target
High needs
59.0
55.0
-4.0
51.0
No
115
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
59.0
54.0
-5.0
51.0
No
85
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
62.5
54.5
-8.0
51.0
No
50
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
74.0
46.0
-28.0
51.0
No
21
50
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
61.0
63.0
2.0
51.0
No
244
100
Above Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
2
-
High needs
-
60.0
2
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
2
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.1
97.1
0.0
80.0
90.0
314
100
Above Target
High needs
95.5
95.8
0.3
80.0
90.0
165
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
92.9
90.6
-2.3
80.0
90.0
53
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
13
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
16
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
97.4
97.1
-0.3
80.0
90.0
276
100
Above Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.9
97.1
-0.8
85.0
95.0
306
100
Above Target
High needs
96.8
95.5
-1.3
85.0
95.0
156
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
98.0
92.9
-5.1
85.0
95.0
42
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
3
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
11
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
14
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
98.0
97.4
-0.6
85.0
95.0
270
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
0.4
0.4
0.7
-0.3
0.2
0.2
62
1302
25
No Change
High needs
0.2
1.2
1.7
-0.5
0.1
0.1
58
477
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
2.0
2.0
2.1
-0.1
1.8
1.0
54
287
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.4
2.0
-1.6
0.0
0.0
50
246
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
42
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1.8
1.4
1.1
0.3
0.9
0.9
64
87
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
37
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
White
0.3
0.3
0.7
-0.4
0.2
0.2
54
1122
25
No Change
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
320
319
100
Yes
321
319
99
Yes
321
321
100
Yes
High needs
126
126
100
Yes
126
125
99
Yes
126
126
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
95
95
100
Yes
95
94
99
Yes
95
95
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
56
56
100
Yes
56
55
98
Yes
56
56
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Asian
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
14
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
23
23
100
Yes
23
23
100
Yes
23
23
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
11
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
268
267
100
Yes
269
267
99
Yes
269
269
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.