Patrick Kelley, Principal Mailing Address: 112 Elm Street Byfield, MA 01922-2814
Phone: (978) 462-8171 FAX: (978) 465-6868 Website: http://www.tritonschools.org/high
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
97.3
99.2
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
295
939
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
92.9
97.8
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
7.1
2.2
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
12.2 to 1
12.9 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
1.8
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
23
96
0
78
9
13
89.1
N/A
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
20
96
30
65
0
5
95.0
N/A
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
38
93
16
71
5
8
93.4
54.5
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
170
99
57
40
1
2
98.5
49.0
159
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
77
96
52
43
3
3
97.7
43.0
70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
97
100
59
40
0
1
99.2
56.0
93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
174
98
56
41
1
2
98.6
48.0
163
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
173
99
62
36
2
0
99.3
52.0
158
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
23
96
9
30
48
13
72.8
N/A
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
21
100
48
29
19
5
90.5
N/A
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
40
98
35
25
33
8
83.1
40.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
171
99
67
22
9
2
95.5
51.0
159
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
79
99
73
16
6
4
95.9
55.0
71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
97
100
63
25
12
0
95.1
49.0
93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
176
99
68
21
10
2
95.5
51.0
164
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
169
98
67
26
5
2
96.9
46.0
157
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
24
100
0
25
67
8
71.9
N/A
N/A
115
99
1
17
50
32
59.1
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
22
100
5
59
32
5
85.2
N/A
N/A
115
98
3
30
53
15
70.4
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
42
100
2
50
43
5
82.1
N/A
N/A
203
99
2
27
50
21
66.7
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
100
0
50
30
20
75.0
N/A
N/A
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
100
0
21
36
43
53.6
N/A
N/A
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
170
100
28
50
21
1
92.1
N/A
N/A
602
99
14
38
41
7
80.9
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
81
100
32
51
15
2
93.2
N/A
N/A
320
100
14
37
38
11
79.2
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
95
100
23
52
25
0
91.3
N/A
N/A
317
99
13
38
42
7
80.7
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
100
0
43
21
36
62.5
N/A
N/A
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
176
100
27
51
20
1
92.2
N/A
N/A
637
99
14
38
40
9
79.9
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
161
99
27
58
15
0
94.3
N/A
N/A
606
99
13
47
34
6
84.2
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 Accountability Data - Triton Regional High School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals Low assessment participation (Less than 95%)
Focus on High needs -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
57
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
77
Met Target
High needs
65
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
77
Met Target
Triton Regional High School: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.4
99.3
98.6
-0.7
99.1
99.2
61
174
100
Above Target
High needs
94.7
97.0
93.4
-3.6
96.9
97.4
40
38
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
98.3
99.3
98.5
-0.8
99.0
99.2
44
170
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
96.2
96.9
95.5
-1.4
97.8
98.1
71
176
25
No Change
High needs
88.0
87.5
83.1
-4.4
93.0
94.0
54
40
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
96.1
96.8
95.5
-1.3
97.7
98.1
61
171
25
No Change
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.6
94.3
92.2
-2.1
96.9
97.3
51
176
25
No Change
High needs
91.3
83.8
82.1
-1.7
94.9
95.7
45
42
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
94.4
94.0
92.1
-1.9
96.7
97.2
34
170
25
No Change
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
62.4
55.7
174
0
0.0
1.1
174
0
High needs
28.6
15.8
38
0
0.0
5.3
38
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
20
-
-
-
20
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
62.3
57.1
170
0
0.0
1.2
170
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
66.9
67.6
176
0
1.8
1.1
176
25
High needs
42.5
35.0
40
0
7.5
5.0
40
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
66.9
67.3
171
0
1.8
1.2
171
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
27.3
27.3
176
0
0.0
0.6
176
0
High needs
8.1
2.4
42
0
0.0
2.4
42
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
24
-
-
-
24
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
27.7
28.2
170
0
0.0
0.6
170
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
52.0
48.0
-4.0
51.0
No
163
50
Below Target
High needs
32.0
54.5
22.5
51.0
No
32
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
19
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
52.0
49.0
-3.0
51.0
No
159
50
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
46.0
51.0
5.0
51.0
No
164
75
On Target
High needs
27.0
40.0
13.0
51.0
No
33
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
19
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
45.0
51.0
6.0
51.0
No
159
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
3
-
High needs
-
60.0
3
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
3
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
86.6
89.6
3.0
80.0
90.0
193
75
On Target
High needs
71.1
72.4
1.3
80.0
90.0
58
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
29
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
6
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
86.8
90.8
4.0
80.0
90.0
184
75
On Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
92.6
87.6
-5.0
85.0
95.0
201
75
On Target
High needs
81.0
72.4
-8.6
85.0
95.0
76
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
31
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
92.9
87.4
-5.5
85.0
95.0
190
75
On Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
2.6
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.5
1.3
52
730
75
On Target
High needs
8.6
3.1
1.3
1.8
5.0
4.3
61
155
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
87
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
91
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
2.8
1.6
0.9
0.7
1.6
1.4
44
694
75
On Target
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
183
180
98
Yes
183
182
99
Yes
182
182
100
Yes
High needs
43
40
94
No
43
42
98
Yes
43
43
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
23
-
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
24
-
-
-
24
-
-
-
24
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
176
174
99
Yes
176
175
99
Yes
175
175
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.