Andrew Stephens, Principal Mailing Address: 390 Lincoln Rd Sudbury, MA 01776
Phone: (978) 443-9961 FAX: (978) 443-8824 Website: http://www.lsrhs.net Organization Description: 9-12 One school district
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
63
96
17
44
24
14
87.3
N/A
N/A
63
96
17
44
24
14
87.3
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
20
95
10
70
15
5
91.3
N/A
N/A
20
95
10
70
15
5
91.3
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
81
96
17
51
21
11
89.2
N/A
N/A
81
96
17
51
21
11
89.2
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
17
100
6
59
35
0
86.8
N/A
N/A
17
100
6
59
35
0
86.8
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
20
100
60
35
5
0
98.8
N/A
N/A
20
100
60
35
5
0
98.8
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
17
94
41
47
12
0
97.1
N/A
N/A
17
94
41
47
12
0
97.1
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
21
96
57
24
14
5
92.9
N/A
N/A
21
96
57
24
14
5
92.9
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
295
99
56
37
5
3
97.6
N/A
N/A
295
99
56
37
5
3
97.6
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
196
100
51
37
8
4
95.8
N/A
N/A
196
100
51
37
8
4
95.8
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
175
97
55
38
6
1
98.1
N/A
N/A
175
97
55
38
6
1
98.1
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
19
91
42
42
16
0
93.4
N/A
N/A
19
91
42
42
16
0
93.4
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
371
98
53
37
7
2
96.9
N/A
N/A
371
98
53
37
7
2
96.9
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
379
99
47
43
8
1
96.1
N/A
N/A
379
99
47
43
8
1
96.1
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
83
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
97
Met Target
High needs
79
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
82
Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
97
Met Target
Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.2
99.2
99.4
0.2
99.1
99.1
79
385
100
Above Target
High needs
93.1
97.0
97.6
0.6
96.6
96.6
76
82
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
91.7
98.3
97.6
-0.7
93.1
95.9
75
21
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
91.9
97.1
96.8
-0.3
96.0
96.0
78
63
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
96.3
100.0
100.0
0.0
98.2
98.2
81
23
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
98.9
99.8
99.4
-0.4
99.5
99.5
72
303
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.4
97.0
98.5
1.5
98.7
98.7
93
386
100
Above Target
High needs
90.3
88.1
93.1
5.0
95.2
95.2
89
83
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
79.3
94.4
96.3
1.9
82.8
89.7
94
20
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
89.1
85.2
91.0
5.8
94.6
94.6
90
64
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
97.2
100.0
100.0
0.0
98.6
98.6
89
23
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
98.4
98.5
98.4
-0.1
99.2
99.2
87
304
100
Above Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.2
96.1
97.1
1.0
96.6
96.6
82
368
75
On Target
High needs
78.0
85.4
89.7
4.3
89.0
89.0
77
78
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
78.6
88.9
91.3
2.4
82.2
89.3
80
20
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
76.7
82.3
87.9
5.6
88.4
88.4
80
60
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
94.4
100.0
98.8
-1.2
97.2
97.2
68
20
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
94.9
98.1
97.9
-0.2
97.5
97.5
83
292
100
Above Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
73.6
70.9
385
0
0.3
0.0
385
25
High needs
36.9
32.9
82
0
1.2
0.0
82
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
51.7
23.8
21
0
0.0
0.0
21
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
26.7
31.7
63
25
1.7
0.0
63
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
88.9
95.7
23
0
0.0
0.0
23
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
77.8
71.0
303
0
0.0
0.0
303
25
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
83.4
82.1
386
0
1.3
0.5
386
25
High needs
50.0
48.2
83
0
6.1
2.4
83
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
55.6
50.0
20
0
0.0
5.0
20
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
44.1
46.9
64
0
6.8
3.1
64
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
100.0
95.7
23
0
0.0
0.0
23
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
88.5
83.9
304
0
0.7
0.3
304
25
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
47.5
53.3
368
25
0.8
0.5
368
25
High needs
16.9
17.9
78
0
3.9
2.6
78
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
22.2
10.0
20
0
3.7
5.0
20
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
14.5
18.3
60
25
3.6
3.3
60
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
74.1
60.0
20
0
0.0
0.0
20
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
49.7
56.2
292
25
0.0
0.3
292
0
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
50.0
41.0
-9.0
51.0
No
337
50
Below Target
High needs
52.0
45.0
-7.0
51.0
No
66
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
18
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
52.5
45.0
-7.5
51.0
No
50
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
77.0
43.5
-33.5
51.0
No
22
50
Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
21
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
51.0
38.5
-12.5
51.0
No
260
25
Below Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
61.5
56.0
-5.5
51.0
Yes
345
75
On Target
High needs
56.5
53.5
-3.0
51.0
Yes
66
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
66.5
54.5
-12.0
51.0
Yes
50
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
66.0
77.5
11.5
51.0
No
22
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
23
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
65.0
54.0
-11.0
51.0
No
267
75
On Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
2
-
High needs
-
60.0
2
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
2
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
96.3
95.7
-0.6
80.0
90.0
395
100
Above Target
High needs
86.6
85.2
-1.4
80.0
90.0
108
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
83.9
82.6
-1.3
80.0
90.0
86
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
20
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
22
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
10
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
11
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
96.4
95.2
-1.2
80.0
90.0
332
100
Above Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.0
98.0
0.0
85.0
95.0
402
100
Above Target
High needs
92.5
92.9
0.4
85.0
95.0
112
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
90.5
90.8
0.3
85.0
95.0
87
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
23
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
20
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
9
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
97.6
97.9
0.3
85.0
95.0
337
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
93
1600
100
Above Target
High needs
0.3
0.0
0.3
-0.3
0.2
0.2
89
318
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
0.0
0.0
1.2
-1.2
0.0
0.0
66
81
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
91
247
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
Asian
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
64
95
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
76
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
63
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
70
64
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
95
1301
100
Above Target
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
393
388
99
Yes
393
389
99
Yes
393
387
98
Yes
High needs
90
85
95
Yes
90
86
96
Yes
90
86
96
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
22
21
95
Yes
22
20
92
No
22
21
95
Yes
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
70
66
95
Yes
70
67
96
Yes
70
67
96
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
23
23
100
Yes
23
23
100
Yes
23
23
100
Yes
Afr. Amer./Black
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
23
23
100
Yes
23
23
100
Yes
23
22
96
Yes
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
White
310
306
99
Yes
310
307
99
Yes
310
306
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.