This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
97.5
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
71
7,031
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
97.9
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
2.1
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
17.6 to 1
14.2 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.7
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
21
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
57
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
51
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
44
Did Not Meet Target
Students w/ disabilities
29
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
63
Did Not Meet Target
Hispanic/Latino
54
Did Not Meet Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
66
Did Not Meet Target
Jacob Hiatt Magnet: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
83.4
78.9
77.6
-1.3
90.3
91.7
22
208
25
No Change
High needs
80.8
76.0
74.7
-1.3
88.8
90.4
44
147
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
76.1
76.1
75.0
-1.1
78.1
88.1
41
116
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
77.3
77.1
74.1
-3.0
86.8
88.7
64
80
0
Declined
Students w/ disabilities
67.6
-
51.9
-0.7
81.1
83.8
17
26
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
86.2
82.1
76.2
-5.9
92.0
93.1
57
43
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
79.3
74.8
73.1
-1.7
87.9
89.7
53
105
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
88.9
81.3
87.5
6.2
93.5
94.5
47
32
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
78.3
73.2
73.4
0.2
87.3
89.2
12
208
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
75.1
69.9
69.2
-0.7
85.5
87.6
23
147
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
69.6
69.6
69.4
-0.2
72.1
84.8
23
116
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
76.0
72.9
68.1
-4.8
86.0
88.0
32
80
0
Declined
Students w/ disabilities
55.9
-
44.2
-5.8
74.3
78.0
8
26
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
74.5
76.0
73.8
-2.2
85.1
87.3
59
43
25
No Change
Hispanic/Latino
75.6
69.3
67.1
-2.2
85.8
87.8
27
105
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
86.1
73.6
82.0
8.4
91.9
93.1
20
32
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
78.0
68.6
79.8
11.2
87.2
89.0
46
52
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
75.6
63.2
78.0
14.8
85.8
87.8
82
33
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
63.8
63.8
76.9
13.1
66.8
81.9
86
26
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
73.1
-
-
-
-
86.6
-
23
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
6.7
9.6
208
25
7.6
11.5
208
0
High needs
6.8
6.1
147
0
10.1
13.6
147
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
6.9
5.2
116
0
8.6
12.9
116
0
EL and Former EL
5.6
6.3
80
25
11.3
13.8
80
0
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
26
0
31.6
42.3
26
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Afr. Amer./Black
10.2
11.6
43
25
4.1
9.3
43
0
Hispanic/Latino
4.8
5.7
105
25
10.5
16.2
105
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
11.1
21.9
32
25
8.3
6.3
32
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
17.1
13.9
208
0
13.8
15.4
208
0
High needs
14.2
11.6
147
0
17.6
19.0
147
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
14.7
9.5
116
0
18.1
19.0
116
0
EL and Former EL
12.7
13.8
80
0
12.7
18.8
80
0
Students w/ disabilities
5.3
0.0
26
0
44.7
50.0
26
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Afr. Amer./Black
18.4
16.3
43
0
12.2
9.3
43
25
Hispanic/Latino
11.4
8.6
105
0
17.1
22.9
105
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
30.6
12.5
32
0
13.9
6.3
32
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
14.9
11.5
52
0
21.3
5.8
52
25
High needs
8.8
9.1
33
0
29.4
9.1
33
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
10.3
7.7
26
0
27.6
7.7
26
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
53.5
48.0
-5.5
51.0
No
145
50
Below Target
High needs
55.0
44.0
-11.0
51.0
No
100
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
54.0
39.0
-15.0
51.0
No
79
25
Below Target
EL and Former EL
58.0
48.0
-10.0
51.0
No
50
50
Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
19
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
57.0
44.0
-13.0
51.0
No
33
50
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
51.0
48.0
-3.0
51.0
No
71
50
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
61.0
65.5
4.5
51.0
Yes
24
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
54.0
46.0
-8.0
51.0
No
146
50
Below Target
High needs
46.5
44.0
-2.5
51.0
No
101
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
42.0
46.5
4.5
51.0
No
80
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
37.0
35.0
-2.0
51.0
No
51
25
Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
19
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
49.0
35.0
-14.0
51.0
No
33
25
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
51.0
51.0
0.0
51.0
No
72
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
70.0
47.5
-22.5
51.0
Yes
24
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
52.5
60.0
108
0
High needs
52.5
60.0
108
0
EL and Former EL
52.5
60.0
108
0
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
211
210
100
Yes
211
210
100
Yes
52
52
100
Yes
High needs
150
149
99
Yes
150
149
99
Yes
33
33
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
118
117
99
Yes
118
117
99
Yes
26
26
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
82
82
100
Yes
82
82
100
Yes
18
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
27
26
96
Yes
27
26
96
Yes
9
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
12
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
44
44
100
Yes
44
44
100
Yes
13
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
107
106
99
Yes
107
106
99
Yes
23
23
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
16
-
-
-
16
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
32
32
100
Yes
32
32
100
Yes
9
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
