Gina Nieves, Principal Mailing Address: 52 Lake Parkway Webster, MA 01570
Phone: (508) 943-8552 FAX: (508) 949-8274
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
97.5
99.2
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
176
542
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
95.5
98.5
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
4.5
1.5
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
11.6 to 1
14.9 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
15
95
0
47
40
13
78.3
N/A
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
45
96
18
64
16
2
93.9
37.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
51
97
16
59
22
4
90.7
37.0
42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
18
95
11
56
22
11
84.7
N/A
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
76
95
28
62
9
1
96.1
37.0
69
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
58
96
19
62
12
7
91.4
33.0
49
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
50
97
30
56
14
0
95.5
43.0
44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
10
100
20
50
30
0
92.5
N/A
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
108
96
24
59
13
4
93.3
37.0
93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
15
95
13
40
27
20
75.0
N/A
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
43
94
21
28
30
21
75.0
53.0
37
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
49
95
20
29
31
20
75.0
53.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
17
95
12
18
35
35
61.8
N/A
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
77
97
42
22
23
13
82.5
56.0
68
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
58
97
36
22
28
14
81.0
58.5
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
50
96
32
24
24
20
76.5
53.5
44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
108
97
34
23
26
17
78.9
55.0
92
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
15
95
0
13
53
33
56.7
N/A
N/A
83
97
0
4
30
66
38.3
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26
97
0
4
54
42
45.2
N/A
N/A
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
45
93
9
38
40
13
74.4
N/A
N/A
189
93
2
16
42
40
52.8
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
51
93
8
33
45
14
72.1
N/A
N/A
218
94
2
15
43
40
52.1
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
100
0
0
53
47
38.3
N/A
N/A
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
17
90
0
41
47
12
72.1
N/A
N/A
74
93
1
15
47
36
52.4
N/A
N/A
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26
100
4
23
46
27
62.5
N/A
N/A
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
76
97
13
47
32
8
81.6
N/A
N/A
265
97
4
27
43
27
63.6
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
57
100
11
46
33
11
78.9
N/A
N/A
189
98
3
24
42
31
61.4
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
49
91
10
43
39
8
78.1
N/A
N/A
200
95
3
24
46
28
60.1
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
100
0
0
45
55
40.9
N/A
N/A
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
12
100
17
25
50
8
75.0
N/A
N/A
43
98
5
16
44
35
55.2
N/A
N/A
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
106
96
10
44
36
9
78.5
N/A
N/A
389
96
3
24
44
29
60.7
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
241
99
7
24
42
27
64.8
N/A
N/A
411
98
5
20
45
30
60.5
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 7 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
2015
131
99
8
43
27
18
5
83.3
60.0
129
136
99
9
41
28
17
5
82.7
60.0
129
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 7 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
2015
131
99
2
27
37
27
6
62.0
55.0
129
136
99
2
27
37
27
7
61.8
55.0
129
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 8 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
2015
145
99
1
21
29
31
18
60.5
46.0
143
147
99
1
21
29
31
18
60.4
46.0
143
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
2015
142
97
8
41
29
15
8
89.1
66.0
139
144
97
8
41
29
15
8
89.2
66.0
139
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
2015
273
98
8
42
28
16
6
86.3
63.0
268
846
97
6
37
30
18
9
78.0
58.0
673
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
2015
276
99
1
24
33
29
12
61.3
49.0
272
855
98
2
23
31
30
14
63.1
45.0
675
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Bartlett High School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 3
Among lowest performing 20% of schools and subgroups
Focus on High needs -
Low assessment participation (Less than 95%)
Focus on Economically disadvantaged -High needs -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
13
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
39
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
48
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
45
Did Not Meet Target
Bartlett High School: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.4
94.4
93.3
-1.1
94.9
97.2
13
108
25
No Change
High needs
90.1
90.1
90.7
0.6
90.9
95.1
22
51
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
89.3
89.3
93.9
4.6
90.2
94.7
32
45
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
95.3
95.3
96.1
0.8
95.7
97.7
12
76
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
84.0
84.0
78.9
-5.1
85.3
92.0
11
108
0
Declined
High needs
76.5
76.5
75.0
-1.5
78.5
88.3
18
49
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
81.0
81.0
75.0
-6.0
82.6
90.5
14
43
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
84.2
84.2
82.5
-1.7
85.5
92.1
5
77
25
No Change
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
84.4
84.4
78.5
-5.9
85.7
92.2
15
106
0
Declined
High needs
78.1
78.1
72.1
-6.0
79.9
89.1
16
51
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
80.9
80.9
74.4
-6.5
82.5
90.5
21
45
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
86.4
86.4
81.6
-4.8
87.5
93.2
4
76
0
Declined
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
44.1
24.1
108
0
3.9
3.7
108
0
High needs
24.5
15.7
51
0
7.5
3.9
51
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
31.0
17.8
45
0
7.1
2.2
45
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
44.6
27.6
76
0
2.7
1.3
76
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
45.0
34.3
108
0
12.0
16.7
108
0
High needs
27.5
20.4
49
0
19.6
20.4
49
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
28.6
20.9
43
0
11.9
20.9
43
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
47.9
41.6
77
0
12.7
13.0
77
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
18.3
10.4
106
0
7.5
9.4
106
0
High needs
14.6
7.8
51
0
12.5
13.7
51
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
18.4
8.9
45
0
10.5
13.3
45
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
20.6
13.2
76
0
7.4
7.9
76
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
58.0
37.0
-21.0
51.0
No
93
25
Below Target
High needs
54.0
37.0
-17.0
51.0
No
42
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
55.5
37.0
-18.5
51.0
No
38
25
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
56.0
37.0
-19.0
51.0
No
69
25
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
71.0
55.0
-16.0
51.0
No
92
75
On Target
High needs
66.0
53.0
-13.0
51.0
No
41
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
70.0
53.0
-17.0
51.0
No
37
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
73.0
56.0
-17.0
51.0
No
68
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
11
-
High needs
-
60.0
11
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
11
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
67.9
69.9
2.0
80.0
90.0
123
25
No Change
High needs
60.7
61.3
0.6
80.0
90.0
75
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
9
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
11
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
68.6
73.5
4.9
80.0
90.0
98
50
Improved Below Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
72.1
70.1
-2.0
85.0
95.0
134
25
No Change
High needs
58.7
62.9
4.2
85.0
95.0
89
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
25
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
19
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
72.7
71.4
-1.3
85.0
95.0
105
25
No Change
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
6.8
6.8
6.4
0.4
6.2
3.4
13
451
25
No Change
High needs
8.7
8.7
8.9
-0.2
8.0
4.4
10
191
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
7.1
-
-
-
-
3.6
-
154
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
69
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
6.7
6.7
6.3
0.4
6.1
3.4
8
333
25
No Change
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
125
120
96
Yes
123
119
97
Yes
124
119
96
Yes
High needs
62
60
97
Yes
60
57
95
Yes
61
57
94
No
Econ. Disadvantaged
56
54
96
Yes
54
51
94
No
55
51
94
No
EL and Former EL
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
19
-
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
21
-
-
-
20
-
-
-
21
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
88
84
95
Yes
87
84
97
Yes
87
84
97
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.