Joshua C Otlin, Principal Mailing Address: 31 West Fountain Street Milford, MA 01757-4098
Phone: (508) 478-1110 FAX: (508) 478-1460 Website: http://https://www.milfordpublicschools.com/
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
29
97
0
24
59
17
61.2
N/A
N/A
146
98
0
14
49
37
55.8
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
104
99
5
29
41
25
64.7
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
60
99
15
43
33
8
81.3
N/A
N/A
300
99
8
34
41
17
71.4
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
80
99
11
41
40
8
78.4
N/A
N/A
397
99
7
31
42
20
69.6
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
100
14
14
57
14
64.3
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
100
5
40
55
0
77.5
N/A
N/A
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25
100
48
20
20
12
87.0
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
50
99
22
46
26
6
86.5
N/A
N/A
205
100
9
38
36
18
73.7
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25
100
24
36
32
8
81.0
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
164
99
30
48
21
2
90.9
N/A
N/A
583
99
16
45
32
7
83.4
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
124
99
32
44
20
3
89.3
N/A
N/A
473
99
17
40
32
11
80.0
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
111
100
29
47
23
2
91.4
N/A
N/A
406
100
14
43
36
8
81.2
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35
99
0
11
37
51
45.0
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
41
98
27
37
34
2
85.4
N/A
N/A
183
100
10
31
40
19
70.2
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
235
99
31
46
21
3
90.3
N/A
N/A
879
99
15
41
34
10
80.6
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
255
100
26
43
25
6
89.5
N/A
N/A
912
99
16
39
34
11
81.1
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Milford High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 3
Among lowest performing 20% of schools and subgroups
Focus on High needs -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
19
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
60
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
61
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
59
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
57
Did Not Meet Target
Milford High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.6
95.3
98.0
2.7
97.8
97.8
46
254
100
Above Target
High needs
87.8
89.5
94.8
5.3
93.9
93.9
49
92
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
96.2
94.4
95.8
1.4
96.8
98.1
52
71
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
81.3
92.4
89.1
-3.3
90.7
90.7
36
32
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
70.5
85.4
97.4
12.0
85.3
85.3
83
58
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
98.1
98.6
98.2
-0.4
99.1
99.1
36
170
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.2
87.8
90.4
2.6
97.1
97.1
35
254
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
85.3
76.6
79.9
3.3
92.7
92.7
35
91
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
77.8
80.3
81.4
1.1
81.5
88.9
32
70
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
75.0
72.9
67.2
-5.7
87.5
87.5
32
32
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
85.2
74.6
85.3
10.7
92.6
92.6
73
58
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
95.1
92.4
91.9
-0.5
97.6
97.6
28
170
25
No Change
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
90.8
89.5
90.3
0.8
95.4
95.4
39
235
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
80.1
80.0
78.4
-1.6
90.1
90.1
29
80
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
82.8
82.5
81.3
-1.2
85.7
91.4
36
60
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
72.0
78.1
61.2
-16.9
86.0
86.0
12
29
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
66.0
77.0
86.5
9.5
83.0
83.0
77
50
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
92.5
93.9
90.9
-3.0
96.3
96.3
26
164
0
Declined
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
46.0
46.5
254
0
2.5
0.0
254
25
High needs
16.9
18.5
92
0
5.6
0.0
92
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
22.2
23.9
71
0
1.1
0.0
71
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.2
3.1
32
25
0.0
0.0
32
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Hispanic/Latino
23.6
37.9
58
25
9.7
0.0
58
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
55.6
47.1
170
0
0.0
0.0
170
25
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
44.0
46.1
254
0
6.5
4.3
254
25
High needs
14.6
19.8
91
25
14.6
11.0
91
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
20.0
24.3
70
25
10.0
11.4
70
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Students w/ disabilities
6.3
3.1
32
0
12.5
21.9
32
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Hispanic/Latino
21.4
29.3
58
25
18.6
8.6
58
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
52.5
48.8
170
0
2.2
2.9
170
0
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
26.3
30.6
235
25
2.0
2.6
235
0
High needs
4.8
11.3
80
25
4.8
7.5
80
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
6.3
15.0
60
25
1.3
8.3
60
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
29
0
2.5
17.2
29
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Asian
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Hispanic/Latino
9.8
22.0
50
25
8.2
6.0
50
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
32.0
29.9
164
0
0.0
1.8
164
0
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
36.0
52.5
16.5
51.0
Yes
228
100
Above Target
High needs
29.0
49.0
20.0
51.0
Yes
77
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
33.0
43.5
10.5
51.0
No
58
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
22.0
57.5
35.5
51.0
No
30
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
35.5
58.0
22.5
51.0
Yes
50
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
38.5
54.5
16.0
51.0
No
158
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
26.0
32.0
6.0
51.0
Yes
230
75
On Target
High needs
21.0
27.0
6.0
51.0
No
76
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
20.0
26.0
6.0
51.0
No
57
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
50.0
37.0
-13.0
51.0
No
30
25
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
29.0
27.5
-1.5
51.0
Yes
50
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
26.0
32.0
6.0
51.0
No
159
50
Below Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
64.5
60.0
42
25
High needs
64.5
60.0
42
25
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
42
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
88.7
84.2
-4.5
80.0
90.0
272
75
On Target
High needs
78.8
65.0
-13.8
80.0
90.0
120
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
17
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
70.2
63.9
-6.3
80.0
90.0
36
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
11
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
69.7
56.4
-13.3
80.0
90.0
39
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
White
91.6
89.8
-1.8
80.0
90.0
215
75
On Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
90.3
89.8
-0.5
85.0
95.0
283
75
On Target
High needs
77.1
81.1
4.0
85.0
95.0
132
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
10
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
62.5
74.5
12.0
85.0
95.0
47
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
4
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
14
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
33
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
89.9
92.4
2.5
85.0
95.0
225
75
On Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
2.9
2.5
2.3
0.2
1.5
1.5
27
1073
25
No Change
High needs
6.4
7.0
5.6
1.4
3.2
3.2
18
356
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
5.5
5.5
3.5
2.0
5.0
2.8
33
227
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
58
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
7.2
4.0
1.6
2.4
3.6
3.6
56
126
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
7.3
5.5
6.9
-1.4
3.7
3.7
18
216
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
2.2
1.7
1.3
0.4
1.1
1.1
35
777
25
No Change
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
273
271
99
Yes
272
271
100
Yes
273
271
99
Yes
High needs
109
108
99
Yes
108
107
99
Yes
109
108
99
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
80
80
100
Yes
79
79
100
Yes
80
79
99
Yes
EL and Former EL
26
26
100
Yes
27
27
100
Yes
27
26
96
Yes
Students w/ disabilities
36
35
97
Yes
36
35
97
Yes
36
35
97
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
Asian
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
67
67
100
Yes
67
67
100
Yes
67
66
99
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
180
178
99
Yes
179
178
99
Yes
180
179
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
