Christopher Scully, Principal Mailing Address: 128 Town Street Braintree, MA 02184
Phone: (781) 848-4000 FAX: (781) 380-0116
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
67
100
7
37
42
13
77.2
N/A
N/A
287
100
8
24
48
20
69.3
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
100
14
29
47
10
75.8
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
66
100
30
36
29
5
87.5
N/A
N/A
236
99
18
32
39
11
78.3
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
115
100
22
37
34
8
83.5
N/A
N/A
470
100
14
30
44
13
75.8
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
28
100
14
50
32
4
85.7
N/A
N/A
66
100
14
35
39
12
75.4
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
51
100
78
18
2
2
97.5
N/A
N/A
190
100
37
41
19
3
93.0
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
15
100
47
40
13
0
95.0
N/A
N/A
52
100
23
33
37
8
79.8
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
264
100
42
40
15
3
93.8
N/A
N/A
947
99
25
44
26
5
88.0
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
182
100
51
36
10
3
94.1
N/A
N/A
641
100
28
42
24
6
87.9
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
177
100
40
40
19
2
93.4
N/A
N/A
624
100
25
42
29
4
87.5
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
100
0
24
41
35
60.3
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
33
100
55
30
15
0
94.7
N/A
N/A
136
100
23
39
29
9
84.7
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
359
100
45
38
14
3
93.7
N/A
N/A
1,265
100
27
42
26
5
87.7
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
395
100
39
48
12
2
95.8
N/A
N/A
1,359
100
24
47
25
5
89.8
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Braintree High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
58
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
72
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
56
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
49
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
93
Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
68
Did Not Meet Target
Braintree High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.6
99.2
98.6
-0.6
99.3
99.3
60
374
100
Above Target
High needs
96.5
97.6
95.8
-1.8
98.3
98.3
58
126
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
98.9
97.8
97.1
-0.7
99.1
99.5
69
70
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
96.2
96.6
93.6
-3.0
98.1
98.1
61
74
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
98.5
99.5
98.2
-1.3
99.3
99.3
37
55
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
100.0
-
-
-
-
100.0
-
30
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
98.7
99.4
98.7
-0.7
99.4
99.4
48
270
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.4
98.4
97.6
-0.8
98.7
98.7
84
372
100
Above Target
High needs
94.6
95.6
94.2
-1.4
97.3
97.3
92
124
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
96.4
96.0
97.4
1.4
97.0
98.2
98
68
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
95.3
94.1
90.4
-3.7
97.7
97.7
89
73
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
98.5
98.9
98.6
-0.3
99.3
99.3
58
55
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
97.8
98.7
97.5
-1.2
98.9
98.9
77
270
100
Above Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.7
95.8
93.7
-2.1
97.9
97.9
56
359
25
No Change
High needs
90.0
89.7
83.5
-6.2
95.0
95.0
47
115
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
90.0
90.2
87.5
-2.7
91.7
95.0
67
66
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
90.5
85.9
77.2
-8.7
95.3
95.3
53
67
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
96.2
96.7
97.5
0.8
98.1
98.1
44
51
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
96.3
96.4
93.8
-2.6
98.2
98.2
47
264
0
Declined
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
63.1
56.7
374
0
0.0
0.5
374
0
High needs
30.6
27.0
126
0
0.0
1.6
126
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
39.1
40.0
70
0
0.0
1.4
70
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Students w/ disabilities
13.6
12.2
74
0
0.0
2.7
74
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
67.4
70.9
55
0
0.0
1.8
55
0
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
30
-
-
-
30
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
65.0
56.3
270
0
0.0
0.4
270
0
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
72.7
67.2
372
0
0.2
1.1
372
0
High needs
46.0
40.3
124
0
0.8
3.2
124
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
47.8
50.0
68
0
0.0
0.0
68
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Students w/ disabilities
34.6
19.2
73
0
1.2
5.5
73
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
87.0
94.5
55
0
0.0
1.8
55
0
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
28
-
-
-
28
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
72.9
67.0
270
0
0.3
1.1
270
0
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
38.7
45.4
359
25
0.5
1.4
359
0
High needs
19.0
21.7
115
25
1.7
4.3
115
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
24.6
30.3
66
25
0.0
3.0
66
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Students w/ disabilities
7.7
7.5
67
0
2.6
7.5
67
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
48.9
78.4
51
25
0.0
2.0
51
0
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
28
-
-
-
28
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
38.8
42.0
264
0
0.6
1.1
264
0
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
40.0
34.0
-6.0
51.0
No
344
25
Below Target
High needs
40.0
34.5
-5.5
51.0
No
108
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
34.5
34.5
0.0
51.0
No
62
25
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
40.0
30.0
-10.0
51.0
No
63
0
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
54.5
43.0
-11.5
51.0
No
47
50
Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
24
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
40.0
34.0
-6.0
51.0
No
256
25
Below Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
46.5
38.0
-8.5
51.0
No
333
25
Below Target
High needs
49.0
40.0
-9.0
51.0
No
101
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
54.0
32.5
-21.5
51.0
Yes
58
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
48.0
43.0
-5.0
51.0
No
60
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
50.0
46.0
-4.0
51.0
Yes
44
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
22
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
46.0
38.5
-7.5
51.0
No
250
25
Below Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
81.0
60.0
21
25
High needs
81.0
60.0
21
25
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
21
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.3
95.2
1.9
80.0
90.0
394
100
Above Target
High needs
86.0
90.5
4.5
80.0
90.0
158
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
81.3
91.0
9.7
80.0
90.0
78
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
95.2
98.1
2.9
80.0
90.0
52
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
17
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
13
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
93.7
95.1
1.4
80.0
90.0
309
100
Above Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.3
94.8
-0.5
85.0
95.0
405
75
On Target
High needs
88.6
89.6
1.0
85.0
95.0
164
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
85.5
86.3
0.8
85.0
95.0
80
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
97.8
97.6
-0.2
85.0
95.0
42
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
26
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
95.8
95.3
-0.5
85.0
95.0
317
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.0
0.2
0.2
58
1573
25
No Change
High needs
1.1
2.2
1.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
60
488
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
3.7
3.7
2.4
1.3
3.4
1.9
49
249
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.5
2.0
1.4
0.6
0.3
0.3
60
296
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
0.0
1.1
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
64
189
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
0.0
1.2
1.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
50
94
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
56
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
0.2
0.5
0.7
-0.2
0.1
0.1
54
1218
25
No Change
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
381
380
100
Yes
382
380
99
Yes
381
381
100
Yes
High needs
131
131
100
Yes
131
130
99
Yes
130
130
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
73
73
100
Yes
72
71
99
Yes
72
72
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
13
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
74
74
100
Yes
73
73
100
Yes
73
73
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
56
56
100
Yes
56
56
100
Yes
56
56
100
Yes
Afr. Amer./Black
30
30
100
Yes
30
28
96
Yes
30
30
100
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
19
-
-
-
20
20
100
Yes
19
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
274
273
100
Yes
274
274
100
Yes
274
274
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
