• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 34 39 39 PROFICIENT 50 56 52 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 7 6 6 FAILING 2 3 3 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 51 52 56 55 PROFICIENT 30 33 25 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 8 12 13 FAILING 5 6 7 5

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 27 30 36 PROFICIENT 53 56 50 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 13 18 18 FAILING 2 4 3 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 13 16 8 PROFICIENT 64 68 66 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 15 14 14 WARNING 5 4 4 6

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 20 15 7 PROFICIENT 34 32 36 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 32 29 41 WARNING 21 16 20 23

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 4 2 2 PROFICIENT 40 38 33 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 45 52 46 WARNING 9 13 13 14

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 8 5 4 PROFICIENT 67 66 65 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 22 26 27 WARNING 3 4 4 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 13 8 7 PROFICIENT 31 34 37 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 37 34 36 WARNING 19 16 21 24

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 10 7 13 PROFICIENT 59 54 58 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 26 27 26 WARNING 4 10 7 7

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 17 15 19 PROFICIENT 39 36 45 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 32 28 31 WARNING 11 15 12 14

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 13 16 16 PROFICIENT 54 49 52 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 31 27 31 WARNING 7 7 5 6

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 19 30 32 PROFICIENT 37 39 34 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 29 26 24 WARNING 12 14 10 10

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 14 16 20 PROFICIENT 34 35 38 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 41 40 33 WARNING 13 10 6 6

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 11 15 18 PROFICIENT 49 51 46 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 31 30 24 WARNING 7 7 8 8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 16 21 19 PROFICIENT 31 44 37 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 33 37 37 WARNING 6 7 5 8

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 15 15 10 PROFICIENT 58 52 50 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 29 29 36 WARNING 4 5 6 3

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 35 38 34 PROFICIENT 62 38 36 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 18 20 20 WARNING 5 8 6 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.