• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 32 38 33 PROFICIENT 63 54 54 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 13 6 8 FAILING 1 1 2 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 46 63 43 PROFICIENT 40 34 22 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 14 6 15 FAILING 4 6 9 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 32 36 30 PROFICIENT 39 45 45 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 19 16 25 FAILING 10 3 3 0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 4 16 2 PROFICIENT 62 60 69 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 25 14 16 WARNING 9 11 1 13

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 10 10 7 PROFICIENT 32 24 38 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 41 35 31 WARNING 26 25 17 33

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 1 5 5 PROFICIENT 44 45 42 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 37 51 38 WARNING 14 17 2 15

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 16 6 4 PROFICIENT 51 58 61 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 22 22 29 WARNING 8 5 11 7

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 12 11 8 PROFICIENT 28 36 34 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 36 30 32 WARNING 30 16 25 29

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 9 14 9 PROFICIENT 62 58 53 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 20 25 27 WARNING 1 13 8 10

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 33 27 32 PROFICIENT 39 39 36 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 13 25 27 WARNING 9 16 12 10

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 14 12 14 PROFICIENT 56 49 41 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 27 35 40 WARNING 10 11 11 8

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 20 22 27 PROFICIENT 40 32 33 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 30 29 24 WARNING 17 19 16 10

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 13 19 13 PROFICIENT 46 36 33 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 39 34 43 WARNING 17 12 14 7

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 5 7 10 PROFICIENT 34 46 46 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 49 32 36 34 WARNING 15 17 10 13

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 12 17 15 PROFICIENT 27 34 35 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 36 42 48 WARNING 17 18 6 8

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 14 5 12 PROFICIENT 58 43 45 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 39 43 32 WARNING 5 4 7 9

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 22 25 35 PROFICIENT 54 39 41 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 25 25 17 WARNING 7 14 10 10

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.